200 Between Private and Public
Information Society: News and the Media in Eighteenth-Century Paris,”
American Historical Review, 105 (2000): 1–35. For examples derived
from the Stalin-era Soviet Union, see Sarah Davies, Popular Opinion in
Stalin’s Russia: Terror, Propaganda and Dissent, 1934–1941 (New York:
Cambridge University Press, 1997); Fitzpatrick, Everyday Stalinism, chap-
ter 7. For examples from Nazi Germany, see Ian Kershaw, Popular Opinion
and Political Dissent in the Third Reich, Bavaria 1933–1945 (Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press, 1983).- BOA, Cevdet-Zaptiye, no: 302 (27 Z 1212 / 12 June 1798).
28.abi Efendi, C Cabi Tarihi: Tarih-i Sultan Selim-i Salis ve Mahmud-ı Sani
[Cabi’s History: A History of Sultan Selim III and Mahmut II], edited by
Mehmet Ali Beyhan (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2003), 392.
29.or an example of such subversive strategies, see Cabi Efendi, F Cabi Tarihi,
947–948.
30.e intelligence activity reached its peak during the reign of Abdülhamid II Th
(1876–1908), but its main purpose was the denunciation and prosecution
of political public discourse.
31.or the distinction in the case of India, see Ranajit Guha, F Elementary
Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India (Delhi: Oxford University
Press, 1983), 259.
32.aker, B Inventing the French Revolution, especially chapter 8, “Public
Opinion as Political Invention.” Also, see Paul Rabinow, ed., The Foucault
Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought (New York: Penguin, 1984),
242, where Foucault says, “What was discovered at that time—and this was
one of the great discoveries of political thought at the end of the eighteenth
century—was the idea of society [emphasis original].”
33.ülru Necipoğlu, G Architecture, Ceremonial and Power: The Topkapı
Palace in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries (Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1991), 16; Gülru Necipoğlu, “Framing the Gaze in
Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Palaces,” Ars Orientalis 23, Special Issue on
Pre-modern Islamic Palaces (1993): 304–342.
34.hirine Hamadeh, S The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eighteenth Century
(Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2007). See especially chapter 2.
35.elegating much of his power to the grand vizier, Mehmed IV, “the D
Hunter,” devoted a great deal of his time to hunting away from Istanbul,
much to the dismay of the public.