Publics, Politics and Participation

(Wang) #1

362 Resisting Publics


Nationalism and assassination


The murder of Prime Minister Boutros Ghali Pasha in Cairo on
20 February 1910 shocked a country that had not seen a political assas-
sination in generations, despite the living memory of an armed revolu-
tion.^7 Egyptians had only recently begun discussing political issues pub-
licly after two decades of relative silence following the exile of many of
the popular leaders following the British occupation of the country in



  1. The first political parties had just been formed in 1907 and public
    opinion was still divided over what attitude to take towards the occupy-
    ing power that claimed to have brought economic and social prosperity
    to the masses through efficient and uncorrupt governance. Many of the
    middle and upper classes recalled that Britain had claimed the occupation
    would be temporary when they marched into the country a generation
    ago, and the Dinshaway incident of 1906 had legitimized many nationalist
    complaints about the British.^8 Furthermore, the relatively young khedive
    [viceroy] was anxious to expand his power and autonomy over what was
    legally his own kingdom. In his ambitions, however, he was engaged in a
    love-hate relationship with the nationalist movement, which also wished
    to see British control over the country terminated but which called for a
    constitution and a form of representative government that would result in
    a limited monarchy.
    n the midst of this, Boutros Ghali, an elder statesman who had sur-I
    vived the vagaries of Egyptian politics for decades, was chosen as a com-
    promise candidate to serve as prime minister and mediate between the
    Khedive and the British Consul. Ghali had alienated many young nation-
    alists by accepting the portfolio of Prime Minister under the extreme
    limitations imposed upon Parliament. Further, as one of three judges, he
    voted for the harsh punishments meted out during the Dinshaway trials.
    When he argued for the unpopular extension of the Suez Canal conces-
    sion, the Nationalist (Watani) Party’s papers were extremely critical of not
    just the concession but the Prime Minister himself. The fact that he was
    a Copt [Egyptian Christian] also played a part in popular resentment,
    as many Muslims felt that the British authorities favored Christians in
    government appointments. When Ghali was shot by a Muslim Watanist,
    many interpreted the motive as religious hatred as well as nationalist fer-
    vor, despite the complete lack of evidence of religious bigotry.

Free download pdf