62 Philosophical Frames
Notes
1.s article first appeared in Thi New Political Science 27, no. 4 (December
2005): 529–541. We extend our gratitude to the editors for kind permission
to reprint this article.
2.uoted by Michael Hardt, “The Withering of Civil Society,” in Q Masses,
Classes and the Public Sphere, edited by Mike Hill and Warren Montag
(London: Verso, 2002), 174, note 1. My italics.
3.Jürgen Habermas, “A Philosophico-Political Profile,” an interview by Perry
Anderson and Peter Dews, New Left Review 151 (May–June 1985): 104.
4.ancy Fraser, “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the N
Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,” in Habermas and the Public
Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992), 110.
5.ürgen Habermas, J Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse
Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), 360. My
italics.
- Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, 371.
7.ürgen Habermas, “Conversations about Questions of Political Theory,” in J
A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany (Lincoln: University of Nebraska
Press, 1997), 133.
8.ya Harik, Ili Politics and Change in a Traditional Society: Lebanon, 1711–
1845 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968), 213–214.
9.ehoshua Porath, “The Peasant Revolt of 1858–1861 in Kisrawan,” Y Asian
and African Studies 2 (1966): 77–157.
10.ee Eugen Weber, S Peasants to Frenchmen (Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press, 1976).
11.ee Francois Furet, S Revolutionary France, 1770– 1880 (Oxford: Blackwell,
1995).
12.ntonio Gramsci, A Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence and Wishart,
1971), 91. For an example of the recycling of traditional loyalties in urban
space, see Waddah Sharara, al-Madina al-Mawqufa (Beirut: Dar al-
Matbu‘at al-sharqiyya, 1985).
13.redric Jameson, “The Politics of Utopia,” F New Left Review 25 (January/
February 2004): 48.
14.ee Craig Calhoun, “Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere,” in S
Habermas and the Public Sphere, 1–48.