The Language of Argument

(singke) #1
1 0 2

cH A Pt eR 5 ■ D e e p A n a l y s i s

The Method of Reconstruction


We can summarize the discussion so far by listing the steps to be taken in
reconstructing an argument. The first two steps were discussed in Chapters
4 and 3, respectively.


  1. Do a close analysis of the passage containing the argument.

  2. List all explicit premises and the conclusion in standard form.

  3. Clarify the premises and the conclusion where necessary.

  4. Break up the premises and the conclusion into smaller parts where this
    is possible.

  5. Arrange the parts of the argument into a chain or tree of subarguments
    where this is possible.

  6. Assess each argument and subargument for validity.^5

  7. If any argument or subargument is not valid, or if it is not clear why
    it is valid, add suppressed premises that will show how to get from the
    premises to the conclusion.

  8. Assess the truth of the premises.
    Remember that the goal of reconstruction is not just technical validity but is,
    instead, to understand why and how the conclusion is supposed to follow
    from the premises.
    After reconstructing the argument, it is often helpful to add some indication
    of its structure. This can be done by numbering the premises and then, after

  9. Mildred must be over forty-three, since she has a daughter who is thirty-
    six years old.

  10. He cannot be a grandfather because he never had children.

  11. That’s not modern poetry; you can understand it.

  12. Harold can’t play in the Super Bowl, because he broke his leg.

  13. Shaquille must be a basketball player, since he is so tall.

  14. Dan is either stupid or very cunning, so he must be stupid.

  15. Susan refuses to work on Sundays, which shows that she is lazy and
    inflexible.

  16. Jim told me that Mary is a professor, so she can’t be a student, since
    professors must already have degrees.

  17. This burglar alarm won’t work unless we are lucky or the burglar uses
    the front door, so we can’t count on it.

  18. His natural talents were not enough; he still lost the match because he
    had not practiced sufficiently.


97364_ch05_ptg01_079-110.indd 102 15/11/13 9:53 AM


some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materiallyCopyright 201^3 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights,
affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Free download pdf