The Language of Argument

(singke) #1
3 4 8

C H A P T E R 1 7 ■ R e f u t a t i o n

Opponent: That’s just like arguing that we should start a fire in a
house in order to bring the debate about getting a new fire engine out
into the public. (paraphrased from an actual interview on National
Public Radio)


  1. King: “In your statement you asserted that our actions, even though
    peaceful, must be condemned because they precipitate violence.
    But can this assertion be logically made? Isn’t this like condemning
    the robbed man because his possession of money precipitated
    the evil act of robbery?” (from Martin Luther King’s “Letter from
    Birmingham Jail”)

  2. A: He owns a red car, so he owns a car.
    b: That’s just like arguing that he owns a toy duck, so he owns a duck.

  3. A: He is holding a baby girl, so he is holding a baby.
    b: That’s just like arguing that he is driving a fire truck, so he is
    driving a fire.


For each of the following arguments, find another argument with the same
basic form in which the premise or premises are clearly true and the conclusion
is clearly false.


  1. If tea is dangerous, so is coffee. Tea isn’t dangerous. So coffee isn’t either.

  2. If it were about to rain, it would be cloudy. It is cloudy. So it’s about to
    rain.

  3. Fred had either ice cream or cake for dessert. He had cake. So he must not
    have had ice cream.

  4. You cannot pass laws against dangerous drugs, because there is no way to
    draw a sharp line between dangerous and nondangerous drugs.

  5. If you have never written a novel, then you are in no position to make
    judgments about novels. So don’t presume to criticize mine.

  6. Since I have written several novels, I am in a position to know which
    novels are good. So you ought to trust me when I say that this one is
    great.

  7. There’s nothing wrong with smoking, since the longer you smoke, the
    longer you live.

  8. If one has nothing to hide, one should not be afraid of being investigated.
    So no one should object to being investigated.

  9. Radicals should not be granted freedom of speech, because they deny this
    freedom to others.

  10. In nature, a species is more likely to survive when its weak members die
    out, so we should let the weak in our society die out.


Exercise VII

97364_ch17_ptg01_333-350.indd 348 15/11/13 11:12 AM


some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materiallyCopyright 201^3 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights,
affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Free download pdf