3 5 1

V

A r e a s o f

A r g u m e n t a t i o n

Particular subject matters often give rise to new kinds of arguments and special

standards for assessing arguments. One reason is that arguments in different

areas have different purposes. Much scientific reasoning is aimed at explaining

observations, including findings in experiments, whereas the point of moral

reasoning is not to explain what happens but, rather, to evaluate and to determine

which acts are justified. The audience also varies from one area of argumentation

to another. Some religious reasoning is addressed only to people who already accept

certain basic claims of a religious tradition, such as that the Bible is inspired, whereas

philosophical reasoning typically prides itself in questioning common assumptions

and authorities. Similarly, arguments about different topics often take place within

different institutional contexts with distinctive rules. Legal arguments, for

example, often assume specified burdens of proof, certain basic laws (such as in a

constitution), and other fundamental features of the legal system in the jurisdiction,

whereas moral reasoning is sometimes used to overturn those very same features

of legal systems. Because these areas of argumentation differ in so many ways, we

need to look at each of them separately and carefully to see which standards are

at play in each area. That is one main goal of Part V. Another goal is to provide

extensive examples of arguments both as targets for criticism and as models of how

to construct a good argument. We can get better at arguing for our own views if

we learn to appreciate the strengths in arguments given by other people, including

our opponents. Toward these ends, Part V will discuss and give illustrations of

legal, moral, scientific, religious, and philosophical reasoning in Chapters 18–22,

respectively.

97364_ch18_ptg01_351-382.indd 351 15/11/13 11:38 AM

some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materiallyCopyright 201^3 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights,

affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.