The Language of Argument

(singke) #1
4 5 0

C H A P T E R 2 1 ■ R e l i g i o u s R e a s o n i n g

Jews, Christians, and Moslems share all of these claims about God, but they
are accepted by traditional theologians.
The readings in this chapter are about the traditional Christian God.
William Lane Craig argues for the existence of a traditional Christian
God. Edwin Curley then argues against the existence of such a God. These
readings are slightly revised transcripts of a live debate that occurred at the
University of Michigan in 1999, so they bear some marks of that setting.

FIVE REASONS TO BELIEVE IN GOD


by William Lane Craig

Good Evening! I want to begin by thanking [Michigan Christian Grads] for
inviting me to participate in tonight’s debate. And I want to say what a privi-
lege it is to be debating so eminent a scholar as Professor Curley. When I was
a doctoral student writing my dissertation on the cosmological argument for
God’s existence, Dr. Curley’s work on the famous philosopher Benedict de
Spinoza was a valuable resource to me in trying to analyze Spinoza’s own
argument for God. So it’s a genuine honor to be sharing the podium with
Dr. Curley tonight.
Now in tonight’s debate it seems that there are two basic questions that
we need to ask ourselves:
I. Are there any good reasons to think that God does not exist?
And
II. Are there good reasons to think that God does exist?
Now with respect to the first question, I’ll leave it up to Dr. Curley to present
the reasons why he thinks that God does not exist. Atheist philosophers have
tried for centuries to disprove the existence of God. But no one has ever been
able to come up with a convincing argument. So rather than attack straw men
at this point, I’ll just wait to hear Professor Curley’s answer to the following
question: What good reasons are there to think that God does not exist?
So let’s move on, then, to that second question: Are there good reasons
to think that God does exist? Tonight I’m going to present five reasons why
I think that God exists. Whole books have been written on each one of these,
so all I can present here is a brief sketch of each argument and then go into
more detail as Dr. Curley responds to them.* These reasons are independ-
ent of one another, so that if even one of them is sound, it furnishes good
grounds for believing that God exists. Taken together, they constitute a pow-
erful cumulative case that God exists.

* For a popular presentation of these arguments and responses to typical objections, see my
booklet God, Are You There? (Atlanta: RZIM, 1999).
Source: Five Reasons to Believe in God by William Lane Craig from The Craig-Curley Debate:
The Existence of the Christian God from Reasonable Faith, 2007. Reprinted by permission of
William Lane Craig.

97364_ch21_ptg01_449-464.indd 450 15/11/13 12:22 3M


some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materiallyCopyright 201^3 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights,
affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Free download pdf