100 Strategic Marketing: Planning and Control
Figure 5.5
Cognitive styles
(Source: Adapted
from Hurst et al.,
1989)
Figure 5.6
The senior
management’s
cognitive
composition and its
likely relationship to
business strategy
(Source: Adapted
from Hurst et al.,
1989)
Cognitive Concerned Handles Tends
preference with... these with... to be...
Intuition Possibilities, Metaphors and Ingenious and
patternsideas symbols integrative
Feeling People and values Force of personality Enthusiastic and
insightful
Thinking Cause and effect things Regulations and Reliable and
language orderly
Sensation Activities, events Spontaneity and Adaptable and
action practical
Cognitive composition Time orientation Strategy orientation
Mainly intuitives with Future Prospecting
some feelers
Mainly thinkers with Near-term future Analytical
some sensors and past
Mainly sensors Current Reflective
Mostly feelers with some Past Preserving
intuitives
Mix of intuitives, feelers, Future through Renewing
thinkers and sensors to the past
The balance of the cognitive styles of the
senior management team
The final part of the innovation audit is to evaluate the cognitive prefer-
ence and behaviours of the management team. Although individuals have
the capacity to make use of all their cognitive functions, one area tends to
dominate. The four cognitive preferences are shown in Figure 5.5.
It is important to have a mix of cognitive styles in the senior manage-
ment team that will influence the business’s orientation towards creativity
and innovation. Researchers have hypothesised the likely influence of a
range of senior management team’s potential cognitive profiles as illus-
trated in Figure 5.6.
The whole issue of the nature of groups and the need for balanced
teams is considered further in Chapter 6.