sales was 1 in 20 and we achieve 1 in 25, what does this say about our
sales process?
The process of benchmarking
Benchmarking comprises a four-stage approach. This is illustrated using
the ‘Deming Cycle’ (Watson, 1993): plan, do, check and act (see Figure
14.7). The planning stage involves identifying what to study and who or
what should act as the benchmark. Common areas to benchmark are: cus-
tomer service levels, logistic and distribution methods, product quality
and ‘time-to-market’ cycles. Organisations will benchmark against com-
petitors, acknowledged leaders or successful internal activities. Next, con-
duct research. This may involve co-operation and direct contact with the
benchmark. Alternatively, secondary data may be used to establish stand-
ards and actions. The data is then analysed. This involves establishing the
extent of performance gaps and identifying assignable causes for such
gaps. Finally, the lessons learned are adapted, as appropriate, and applied
in order to generate improvement in performance.
Control 287
Act Plan
Adapt, implement
and monitor
What and who
Act Plan
Do
Check Do
Analyse findings
and assign cause
Direct contact and
secondary data
Check Figure 14.7
The Deming
Cycle applied to
Benchmarking
(Source: Watson,
1993, p. 4)
■ Controlling marketing
performance
In contrast to mechanical systems, marketing activities are inherently
more volatile. This is due to a constantly changing business environment
driven by the needs and wants of the market. Measuring marketing per-
formance is a process of determining appropriate criteria by which to
judge activity. Kotler (1997) identifies four main areas associated with the
control of marketing activity (see Figure 14.8).