to assert socioeconomic justice as a reciprocal and
valid prerequisite for the enactment of the Sharì≠a
penal and justice system in those areas that have
adopted its criminal code, such as northern Nigeria.
In some respects, the upsurge in the adoption of the
Sharì≠a advanced the goals of decentralization and
fostered the accessibility of grassroots communities
to the legal system. Nevertheless, this dividend is
offset by the gender backlash reinforced by the
trend. Similarly, the value of expediting and settling
disputes without strict adherence to written rules of
procedure in Sharì≠a courts is discounted by dis-
parate rules for testimonial competence that spell
civil death for women and impinge on due process
norms. The extent to which patriarchal prejudice
informs the realities and options of women varies.
Women are not a monolithic category; they are dif-
ferentiated by socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and
other variables that mediate their individual expe-
riences. Furthermore, women are not passive objects
of patriarchal institutions and discourses, but
autonomous agents who actively negotiate their
subjectivities. For example, Hirsch (1998), dealing
with Swahili marital disputes, shows how Muslim
women successfully navigate and at times manipu-
late the qà∂ìcourt system in Kenya.Impediments and remedies
Gender disparities characterize the access of
women to the legal system. This phenomenon is
attributable to a confluence of factors that are
compounded by women’s poverty and illiteracy.
The burden that women bear magnifies the geo-
graphic distance of legal forums and ordinary chal-
lenges of the legal sector such as prohibitive costs,
cumbersome procedures and technicalities, pro-
tracted proceedings, and language difficulties. The
handicap posed by inadequate services and out-
reaches, the shortage of skilled or competent per-
sonnel, and the non-implementation of judgments
and policy or legislative decisions, among other
factors, attains harsher proportions in the face of
persistent inconsistencies and conflicts of laws, lack
of knowledge and understanding, social reproba-
tion, and fear of reprisals. These constraints are
further complicated in settings characterized by
civil war and conflict.
Strategies to improve the access of African
women to the legal system address considerations
of demand, supply, and context to promote just
outcomes, fair and equitable treatment, responsive
and affordable procedures, comprehensibility, and
predictability. Frameworks articulated to enhance
the effectiveness, efficiency, credibility, and accessi-
bility of the legal system often outline an inventory382 law: access to the legal system
of interventions to inspire confidence and build
capacity, stimulate enabling environment, and red-
ress systematic gender bias in the content of law,
the nature of legal processes, and the delivery of
legal services. Some interventions give centrality to
progressive reinterpretations of Sharì≠a, cultivating
dynamic civil society, nurturing transparency and
accountability, influencing favorable policy levers
and legislative instruments, supporting participa-
tion and training of stakeholder and auxiliaries,
and promoting gender-friendly legal education.
Other remedial measures give differing degrees of
emphasis to contesting gender-specific derivative
rights, regularizing rules of evidence and proof,
streamlining exacting procedures, rethinking con-
cessions to legal pluralism, dispelling fears and
countering disincentives to access, establishing spe-
cialized tribunals and summary proceedings for
gender-sensitive matters, instituting mobile clinics
and courts, and safeguarding due process.Conclusion
Effective access denotes the recognition of rights
and entitlements, capabilities to assert rights and
seek protection, and infrastructure to enforce re-
medies and catalyze autonomous agency. As anti-
discrimination norms travel across radically different
histories, cultures, and structures, substantive access
to the legal system is fundamental to vindicate
Muslim women’s needs, constraints, and vulnera-
bilities. Gender-responsive legal reform initiatives
typically privilege advocacy, policy dialogue or
negotiation, and legislative review or reform. Once
enacted, laws do not grow limbs with which to run
after and apprehend transgressors. It takes the ini-
tiative of relevant beneficiaries to harness the trans-
formative potentials of law.Bibliography
M. Afkhami (ed.), Faith and freedom, Syracuse N.Y.
1995.
J. N. D. Anderson, Islamic law in Africa, London 1954.
A. Christelow, Islamic law in Africa, in N. Levtzion and
R. L. Pouwels, The history of Islam in Africa, Athens,
Ohio 2000, 373–96.
J. Ezeilo, L. M. Tawfiq, and A. Afolabi-Akiyode (eds.),
Sharia implementation in Nigeria. Issues and chal-
lenges on women’s rights and access to justice, Enugu,
Nigeria 2003.
S. Golub, Beyond the rule of law orthodoxy. The legal
empowerment alternative, in Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, Working Papers, Rule of Law
Series, Democracy and Rule of Law Project 41 (Octo-
ber 2003), Washington, D.C., <http://www.ceip.org/
files/Publications/wp41.asp?p=1&from=pubauthor.>
M. Greico, Women, legal reform and development in Sub-
Saharan Africa, in World Bank, Findings, Africa
Region 20 (1994), Washington, D.C., <http://www.
worldbank.org/ afr/findings/english/find20.htm.>