adultery is not even considered to be a crime under
Turkish law (Ilkkaracan and WWHR 1998).
The experience of Turkey shows that legal meas-
ures alone are not at all enough to prevent the neg-
ative impacts of religious and customary practices
for women; their prevention requires an effective
and holistic women’s human rights agenda, inte-
grated with local and national social policies and
politics.Bibliography
S. S. Ali and K. Arif, Blind justice for all? Parallel judicial
systems in Pakistan. Implications and consequences for
human rights, Grabels, France 1994.428 law: customary
DGPSW (Directorate General on the Status and Problems
of Women), Türkiye’de kadin, 2001, Ankara 2001.
P. Ilkkaracan and WWHR (Women for Women’s Human
Rights), Exploring the context of sexuality in eastern
Turkey, in Reproductive Health Matters6 (1998),
66–75, available at < http://www.wwhr.org/?id=743>.
F. Shaheed, Controlled or autonomous. Identity and the
experience of the network, Women Living Under
Muslim Laws, in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture
and Society19 (1994), 997–1019.
WRAG (Women’s Research Action Group), Women, law
and customary practices, Mumbai 1997.Pinar Ilkkaracan