Music Listening, Music Therapy, Phenomenology and Neuroscience

(Nancy Kaufman) #1

ries of her work have appeared in English in the form of articles (2003, 2005) and a book chapter
(2007).


Philosophical background for a phenomenologically inspired procedure
Trondalen devotes considerable energy and reflection to developing a procedure for description and
analysis of improvisations (2004:41-72). She considers it important to focus on the experiences,
events and interpersonal relations in clinical practice before applying theoretical explanations. With
reference to Creswell (1998:236) she makes the following demands:



  • The researcher must suspend her own preconceived understanding of a phenomenon.

  • She must be able to experience an object through her own senses (that is, being conscious of an
    object), as well as seeing it “as real” outside herself.

  • She must be able to describe the individual experience and the meaning ascribed to it in
    statements that capture the essence of the experience (2004:51).


In her search for a philosophical background for the procedure, Trondalen adheres to Føllesdal’s
understanding of Husserl, which implies that meaning is a primordial experience (Føllesdal 1969,
1993). She also acknowledges Polkinghorne’s emphasis on including description, interpretation, and
interpersonal relations (Polkinghorne 1989:45-47), and Merleau-Ponty’s fundamental idea that the
body is the basis for experience of the world.


Trondalen decides to include phenomenology, hermeneutics^32 and bodily experience in her inves-
tigations, and finds an adaptation of Ferrara’s procedures suitable for this purpose. She discusses
Ferrara’s 1984 and 1991 methods, compares adaptations by different researchers, and conducts a
preliminary test analysis (2004:60-72, 496-497). On the basis of these preparations and consider-
ations, she proposes a nine-step phenomenologically inspired procedure for description and analysis
of music therapy improvisations (2004:73-75, 2007:200-204).


Trondalen’s nine-step procedure



  1. Contextual step
    Clarification of the client’s personal, social, biological and musical history, and the client’s history
    of treatment.

  2. Open listening
    a) Listening to the improvisation as one enduring whole many times, allowing different layers of
    sensations, feelings and meaning to emerge.
    b) Body listening: The researcher moves to the music in order to be aware of the bodily
    aspect in the analysis.

  3. Structural step
    a) Description of sound and intensity experienced in time, and drawing of a graphic intensity
    profile.
    b) Structural analysis of the sound and music measured in time (SMMA)^33 , illustrated by a score.
    It is important to notice musical codes and musical relationships between client and therapist at a
    structural level.


32 Hermeneutics can be considered a ”second phenomenology”, as proposed by Ihde (1976:17-23, this chapter p. 9).
33 Trondalen (2004:495) applies an adapted version of Grocke’s Structural Model of Music Analysis (SMMA), described
in this chapter p. 34.

Free download pdf