Handbook of Meat Processing

(Greg DeLong) #1
Emulsifi cation 159

through sensory, chemical, and physical
measurements. They can be performed on
batter or on the fi nal product. Most of them
are off - line measurements performed in a
laboratory. Rapid measurements can be per-
formed at - line (e.g., water and fat content),
but few on - line measurements are available.

Off - Line Measurements

In the following, only measurements directly
related to the emulsifi cation process (i.e.,
water and fat binding and microstructure)
will be discussed.

Microstructure Characterization
Microscopical techniques are useful to char-
acterize the structure of comminuted meat
products. Light microscopy achieved the
observation of fat globules ’ distribution and
protein gel in emulsion - type buffalo meat
sausages (Krishnan and Sharma 1990 ). It
revealed that caseinate and modifi ed whey
form distinct dairy protein gel regions within
meat batters, and this could explain their
ability to enhance the textural properties of
the meat batters compared with the other
dairy proteins (Barbut 2006 ). In minced
ostrich meat batter, confocal microscopy
suggested that the size of the fat droplets
varied with gum type (Chattong et al. 2007 ).
In chicken meat gels, it showed that low - fat
protein gels obtained by pressure and con-
taining microbial transglutaminase had a
more compact and homogeneous micro-
structure compared with controls that were
pressurized but contained no MTGase
(Trespalacios et al. 2007 ). Scanning electron
microscopy was useful to show structure dif-
ferences in low - fat sausages (Morin et al.
2004 ; C á ceres et al. 2008 ).
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
showed that sausages with a higher gum -
to - protein ratio required additional energy
for protein denaturation to occur (Morin et al.
2004 ). It was used to study structural changes

et al. 1984 ; Fern á ndez - Mart í n et al. 2002 ;
Hong 2008 ), (3) during heating (Fernandez -
Martin et al. 1997 ; Yuste et al. 1999a ;
Chattong 2007 ; Supavititpatana and
Apichartsrangkoon 2007 ), or (4) after heating
to increase shelf life (Yuste et al. 1999b ;
Ruiz - Capillas et al. 2007 ).
The effects of high pressure on commi-
nuted meat are diffi cult to compare, due to
the diversity of meat matrixes and the various
ways high pressure is applied. Moreover,
high - pressure conditions are not precisely
enough described (Jim é nez - Colmenero
2002 ).
High - pressure treatment applied to beef
muscles for manufacturing frankfurters suc-
cessfully reduced salt level to 1.5% without
any noticeable change in cook loss, and
emulsion stability of the frankfurters could
be improved with salt reduction, indepen-
dently of the applied pressure level (Crehan
et al. 2000 ). Main limitations are due to
texture modifi cations (MacFarlane et al.
1984, 1986 ; Crehan et al. 2000 ). Pressure -
induced protein gels differ from those induced
by heat, being glossier, smoother, and softer,
and having greater elasticity (Supavititpatana
and Apichartsrangkoon 2007 ). Heat - induced
gels and pressure - induced gels show differ-
ent properties. Heating ( > 40 ° C) under high -
pressure conditions limits the gelling process
of meat systems (Jimenez - Colmenero 2002 ).
When pressure was applied to frankfurters
after cooking, pressurized sausages showed
different texture attributes (less hard) than
heat - treated sausages (Mor - Mur and Yuste
2003 ; Ruiz - Capillas et al. 2007 ). High -
pressure treatment was combined with micro-
bial transglutaminase to enhance the binding
properties, textural parameters, microstruc-
ture, and color in low - fat and low - salt chicken
gels (Trespalacios et al. 2007 ).


Control

Like every food product, the quality of fi nely
comminuted meat products is assessed

Free download pdf