Forensic Dentistry, Second Edition

(Barré) #1

age estimation from oral and dental structures 301



  1. Lamendin, H., and J.C. Cambray. 1981. Etude de la translucidite et des canalicules
    dentinaires pour l’apprdciatio de l’age. J Med Leg Droit Med 24:489–99.

  2. Whittaker, D.K., and M.M. Bakri. 1996. Racial variations in the extent of tooth
    root translucency in ageing individuals. Arch Oral Biol 41:15–19.

  3. Vasiliadis, L., A.I. Darling, and B.G. Levers. 1983. The amount and distribution
    of sclerotic human root dentine. Arch Oral Biol 28:645–49.

  4. Sognnaes, R.F., B.M. Gratt, and P.J. Papin. 1985. Biomedical image processing
    for age measurements of intact teeth. J Forensic Sci 30:1082–89.

  5. Drusini, A., I. Calliari, and A. Volpe. 1991. Root dentine transparency: Age
    determination of human teeth using computerized densitometric analysis.
    Am J Phys Anthropol 85:25–30.

  6. Jensen, B., and J.M. Nielsen. 1968. Age determination in the red fox (Vulpes
    vulpes) from canine tooth sections. Dan Rev Game Biol 5:1–15.

  7. Fletemeyer, J.R. 1978. Laminae in the teeth of the Cape fur seal used for age
    determination. Life Sci 22:695–98.

  8. Stott, G.G., R.F. Sis, and B.M. Levy. 1982. Cemental annulation as an age cri-
    terion in forensic dentistry. J Dent Res 61:814–17.

  9. Lieberman, D.E. 1994. The biological basis for seasonal increments in dental
    cementum and thier applications to archaeological research. J Archaeol Sci
    21:525–39.

  10. Renz, H., et al. 1997. Incremental lines in root cementum of human teeth:
    An approach to their ultrastructural nature by microscopy. Adv Dent Res
    11:472–77.

  11. Naylor, J.W., et al. 1985. Cemental annulation enhancement: A technique for
    age determination in man. Am J Phys Anthropol 68:197–200.

  12. Kvaal, S.I., T. Solheim, and D. Bjerketvedt. 1996. Evaluation of preparation,
    staining and microscopic techniques for counting incremental lines in cemen-
    tum of human teeth. Biotech Histochem 71:165–72.

  13. Sousa, E.M., G.G. Stott, and J.B. Alves. 1999. Determination of age from cemen-
    tal incremental lines for forensic dentistry. Biotech Histochem 74:185–93.

  14. Kagerer, P., and G. Grupe. 2001. On the validity of individual age-at-death diag-
    nosis by incremental line counts in human dental cementum. Technical consid-
    erations. Anthropol Anz 59:331–42.

  15. Charles, D.K., et al. 1986. Cementum annulation and age determination in
    Homo sapiens. I. Tooth variability and observer error. Am J Phys Anthropol
    71:311–20.

  16. Condon, K., et al. 1986. Cementum annulation and age determination in Homo
    sapiens. II. Estimates and accuracy. Am J Phys Anthropol 71:321–30.

  17. Lipsinic, F.E., et al. 1986. Correlation of age and incremental lines in the cemen-
    tum of human teeth. J Forensic Sci 31:982–89.

  18. Wittwer-Backofen, U., J. Gampe, and J.W. Vaupel. 2004. Tooth cementum annu-
    lation for age estimation: Results from a large known-age validation study. Am
    J Phys Anthropol 123:119–29.

  19. Kagerer, P., and G. Grupe. 2001. Age-at-death diagnosis and determination of
    life-history parameters by incremental lines in human dental cementum as an
    identification aid. Forensic Sci Int 118:75–82.

  20. Leigh, R.W. 1925. Dental pathology of American Indian tribes of varied environ-
    mental and food conditions. Am J Phys Anthropol 18:179–95.

Free download pdf