Bitemarks 367
- Dolinak, D., Matshes, E.W., and Lew, E.O. 2005. Forensic pathology: Principles
and practice, xxii, 690. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press. - Christensen, H.L., and Alder, M.E. 1996. Generating transparent bitemark
overlays using a scanner, microcomputer, and laser printer. Nashville, TN: F17,
Odontology Section, American Academy of Forensic Sciences. - Sweet, D., and Bowers, C.M. 1998. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: A compari-
son of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect’s dentition.
J Forensic Sci 43:362–67. - Sweet, D., Parhar, M., and Wood, R.E. 1998. Computer-based production of bite
mark comparison overlays. J Forensic Sci 43:1050–55. - Johansen, R., and Bowers, M.C. 2000. Digital analysis of bite mark evidence:
Using Adode Photoshop. Santa Barbara, CA: Foresnic Imaging Institute. - Dailey, J.C. 2002. The topographic mapping of teeth for overlay production in
bite mark analysis. Atlanta, GA: Odontology Section, American Academy of
Forensic Sciences. - Foy, C.B., Ethier, J., and Senn, D.R. 2008. Exemplar creation in bitemark analysis
using cone beam computed tomography. Washington, DC: F33, Odontology
Section, American Academy of Forensic Sciences. - Thali, M.J., et al. 2003. Bite mark documentation and analysis: The forensic
3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. Forensic Sci Int 135:115–21. - Dalle Grave, C.M., dos Santos, A., Brumit, P.C., Schrader, B.A., and Senn, D.R.
2009. Three dimensional analysis of human anterior teeth. Denver: Odontology
Section, American Academy of Forensic Sciences. - Sognnaes, R.F., et al. 1982. Computer comparison of bitemark patterns in iden-
tical twins. J Am Dent Assoc 105:449–51. - Rawson, R.D., et al. 1984. Statistical evidence for the individuality of the human
dentition. J Forensic Sci 29:245–53. - MacFarlane, T.W., MacDonald, D.G., and Sutherland, D.A. 1974. Statistical
problems in dental identification. J Forensic Sci Soc 14:247–52. - Kieser, J.A., et al. 2007. The uniqueness of the human anterior dentition: A geo-
metric morphometric analysis. J Forensic Sci 52:671–77. - Saks, M.J., and Koehler, J.J. 2005. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identifi-
cation science. Science 309:892–95. - Johnson, L.T., Radmer, T.W., and vanScotter-Asbach, P.J. 2006. Quantification
of individual characteristics of the human dentition. Seattle: Odontology Section,
American Academy of Forensic Sciences. - Johnson, L.T., Radmer, T.W., and Wirtz, T.S. 2008. The verdict is in: Can dental
characteristics be quantified? Washington, DC: Odontology Section, American
Academy of Forensic Sciences. - Metcalf, R.D., Brumit, P.C., Schrader, B.A., and Senn, D.R. 2008. On the unique-
ness of the human dentition. Washington, DC: Odontology Section, American
Academy of Forensic Sciences. - Pretty, I.A., and Sweet, D. 2001. The scientific basis for human bitemark
analyses—A critical review. Sci Justice 41:85–92. - Rothwell, B.R. 1995. Bite marks in forensic dentistry: A review of legal, scientific
issues. J Am Dent Assoc 126:223–32. - Barbenel, J.C., and Evans, J.H. 1974. Bite marks in skin—Mechanical factors.
J Forensic Sci Soc 14:235–38.