Forensic Dentistry, Second Edition

368 Forensic dentistry

64. Sheasby, D.R., and MacDonald, D.G. 2001. A forensic classification of distortion
    in human bite marks. Forensic Sci Int 122:75–78.


65. DeVore, D.T. 1971. Bite marks for identification? A preliminary report. Med Sci
    Law 11:144–45.


66. Millington, P.F. 1974. Histological studies of skin carrying bite marks. J Forensic
    Sci Soc 14:239–40.


67. West, M.H., et al. 1990. The use of human skin in the fabrication of a bite mark
    template: Two case reports. J Forensic Sci 35:1477–85.


68. Bush, M.A., Miller, R.G., Dorion, R., and Bush, P.J. 2008. The role of the skin
    in bite marks: Biomechanical factors and distortion. Washington, DC: F6,
    Odontology Section, American Academy of Forensic Sciences.


69. Miller, R.G., Bush, P.J., Dorion, R., and Bush, M.A. 2008. The role of the skin
    in bite marks: Macroscopic analysis. Washington, DC: F7, Odontology Section,
    American Academy of Forensic Sciences.


70. Bush, P.J., Miller, R.G., Dorion, R., and Bush, M.A. 2008. The role of the skin
    in bite marks: Microscopic analysis. Washington, DC: F8, Odontology Section,
    American Academy of Forensic Sciences.


71. Phillips, B.G., Bush, P.J., Miller, R.G., Dorion, R., and Bush, M.A. 2008. The
    role of the skin in bite marks: Clothing weave transfer. Washington, DC: F9,
    Odontology Section, American Academy of Forensic Sciences.


72. Bush, M.A., et al. 2009. Biomechanical factors in human dermal bitemarks in a
    cadaver model. J Forensic Sci 54:167–76.


73. ThinkQuest Education Foundation. Independent variables. Probability Central.
    http://library.thinkquest.org/11506/prules.html/.


74. Adams, B.J. 2003. Establishing personal identification based on specific patterns
    of missing, filled, and unrestored teeth. J Forensic Sci 48:487–96.


75. Steadman, D.W., Adams, B.J., and Konigsberg, L.W. 2006. Statistical basis for
    positive identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:15 –26.


76. Souviron, R. 2008. Personal communication.


77. Arheart, K.L., and Pretty, I.A. 2001. Results of the 4th ABFO Bitemark
    Workshop—1999. Forensic Sci Int 124:104 –11.


78. ABFO. 2003. Position paper on Bitemark Workshop 4. http://www.abfo.org/
    WorkSH42.htm.


79. Brewer v. State. 2002. MS 424 (MS, 2002).


80. Greenwald, A.G. 1980. The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal
    h i stor y. Am Psychol 35:603 –18.


81. Tavris, C., and Aronson, E. 2007. Mistakes were made (but not by me), x. 1st ed.
    Orlando, FL: Harcourt.


82. Templeton, H. 2008. A statistical modeling approach to fingerprint identifica-
    tion ...: The Madrid error. http://www.henrytempleman.com/madrid_error.


83. In the matter of Samuel Winship, appellant. 1970. 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068,
    25 L.Ed.2d 368.


84. Committee on Science, Technology, and Law. 2007. Identifying the needs of the
    forensic sciences community. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/meeting-
    view.aspx?MeetingID=1846&MeetingNo=2.


85. National Research Council (U.S.) 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the
    United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.