P 1 : KsF
0521551335 c 04 -p 5 CUNY 160 /Joannides 052155 133 1 January 11 , 2007 11 : 34
CATALOGUE 81 COPIES OF SCULPTURES 339
from a depression caused by the death of his first major
patron Lorenzo the Magnificent in 1492. According to
Vasari and Condivi, this statue was not a commission
butwas initiated by Michelangelo, although he may have
carved it intending to present or sell it to Piero de’Medici,
Lorenzo’s son. It was reclaimed by Michelangelo from
the Republican Government in 1495 , which implies that
even though it may have been housed by the Medici, it
had not been purchased by the family (Cagliotti, 2000 ,
pp. 262 – 3 ). The statue was subsequently acquired by the
Strozzi and seems to have been in their possession by15 0 6
(see the comments by M. Hirst in Barocchi, Bramanti, and
Ristori, 1995 ,pp. 323 – 4 ). Exported to France in153 0,it
was sited at Fontainebleau. During the reign of Henri
IV, c. 1600 ,itwas placed on a high pedestal in the Jardin
de l’Etang. It was shown in this position, with protective
bronze drapery added to its evidently vulnerable lower
half, by Israel Silvestre in 1649. TheHerculeswas lost to
sight after the demolition of the Jardin de l’Etang in the
early eighteenth century.
Va r ious proposals for the appearance of Michelangelo’s
statue have been put forward, but that by the compiler is
alone compatible with the figure represented by Silvestre,
whose etching is the single piece of visual evidence indis-
putably connected with the known history of the statue.
If the compiler’s opinion is correct, then it is clear that the