P 1 : JZP
0521551335 c 06 CUNY 160 /Joannides 052155 133 1 January 11 , 2007 11 : 50
CATALOGUES 89–90 COPIES AFTER PAINTINGS 355
have sometimes been attributed to Daniele himself. A
third copy of theIonas, which may perhaps depend from
the present version, is in the Uffizi (15 092F; black chalk,
329 × 272 mm) as Daniele da Volterra, but bearing the
annotationClovio?byPh. Costamagna.
The letter D at the bottom, in pen and ink, suggests that
the present sheet was the fourth in a series of copies after
Michelangelo’s Prophets and Sibyls, but no companion
drawings are known to the compiler.
Comparable colour indications in pen (R,B,V) are
found upon a copy by an unidentified draughtsman after
the figures in theIoram-Iosaphat lunette in Liverpool
(Walker Art Gallery, 1995 , 204 /Brooke, 1998 – 9 ,pp. 183 –
4 ;black chalk, 266 × 425 mm); more elaborate ones, also
in pen, are on a drawing in the Uffizi which, although fre-
quently doubted, may be an autograph study by Daniele
da Volterra for the upper part of hisAssumption of the
Virginin the Della Rovere Chapel in the Trinita dei Monti`
( 203 S; black chalk, 269 × 285 mm).
History
Jeremiah Harman; Samuel Woodburn (Parker’s inclusion
of Sir Thomas Lawrence, whose blind stamp is not to be
found on the sheet, must be an error).
References
Woodburn,184 2,no. 59 (“A highly finished study of the
Jonahfor the Fresco in the Sistine Chapel.”). Woodburn,
184 6,no. 17 (As184 2.). Fisher, 1852 ,p. 4 , pl. 19 (As
Woodburn,184 2.). Fisher, 1865 ,I,p. 17 , pl. 19 (As 1852 .).
Robinson,187 0,no. 35 (Copy from Michel Angelo. It
“seems to reveal the hand of Giulio Clovio.”). Fisher,
187 2,I,p. 15 , pl. 19 (As 1852 .). Fisher,187 9, XXVI/ 28
(“[A]n old and finished drawing from the fresco.”). Gotti,
1875 , II, p. 221. Thode, 1913 ,p. 210 (Copy.). Parker, 1956 ,
no.35 9(“[C]learly old and betrays some skill” but nothing
to warrant attribution to Clovio. Another copy in the
Louvre Inv. 741 /J 264. Colour indications are presumably
B for bianco, V for verde, R for rosso.). Joannides, 2003 a,
p. 327 (Discussion of Louvre Inv. 741 /J 264 .).
CATALOGUE 90
The Woman at the Right of the Iesse-David-Salmon
Lunette
184 6. 105 ;R. 26 ;P.II36 0
Dimensions: 260 × 188 mm
Medium
Red chalk.
Condition
There are wrinkles in the lower right corner and what
appears to be a fracture. There are several areas of abra-
sion, a major area of skinning, accretions, local staining,
widespread foxing, and general uneven discolouration.
There is mould damage along the left edge. The primary
support is drummed by the four edges to the backboard
of the mount, so the verso is not visible.
Inscription
Lower left corner, in pen:michal agnolopreceded by muti-
lated and illegible letters.
Discussion
The provenance from Casa Buonarroti, if correct, opens
the possibility that this drawing might be by an artist who
worked with Michelangelo or one acquainted with him.
The changes of position of the fingers of the right hand
might suggest that the present drawing was made not after
the fresco but after a lost study for it by Michelangelo;
alternatively it might arouse suspicions that this copy was
made to deceive. Neither inference is likely to be correct,
and it seems more probable that this minor pentimento
represents no more than the copyist’s self-correction.
The style suggests an early date, and there are some fea-
tures in common with works by Rosso, as indicated in the
subtle analysis of Nesselrath. However, the drawing lacks
the sharpness and intensity characteristic of Rosso and
the employment of loose, somewhat lack-lustre hatching,
seems alien to him. It may be by the same hand as a copy
of a section from the pendentive of theBrazen Serpentin
Paris (Louvre Inv. 769 /J 218 ;red chalk, 257 × 253 mm).
History
Casa Buonarroti? (the nature of the inscription rather sug-
gests provenance from a group of drawings that seems
to have been in the Cicciaporci Collection); Filippo
Cicciaporci?; Bartolommeo Cavaceppi?; Jean-Baptiste
Wicar; Samuel Woodburn; Sir Thomas Lawrence
(L. 2445 ); Samuel Woodburn.
References
Woodburn, 1836 b,no. 97 (“[E]vidently from nature;
treated in a grand style.”). Woodburn,184 2,no. 7 (As
1836 .). Woodburn,184 6,no. 14 (As184 2.). Fisher,186 2,
p. 4 , pl. 15 (“[A] design for one of the Sibyls in the
Sistine Chapel.15 0 9.”). Fisher, 1865 ,I,p. 23 , pl. 15 (As
186 2.). Robinson,187 0,no. 26 (Michel Angelo; “in all