Sports Medicine: Just the Facts

(やまだぃちぅ) #1
CHAPTER 20 • EXERCISE TESTING 125


  • If score is up to +5, the patient has a very good prog-
    nosis and can be followed safely with regular exercise
    testing. The 5-year survival for this group was 97%. A
    patient in the high-risk group (TM score ≤11) has a
    poor prognosis with a 5-year mortality >25%. The ET
    score is thus valuable for prognosis and should be cal-
    culated in all patients undergoing CAD evaluation.


EXERCISE PRESCRIPTION (ACC/AHA GUIDELINES
FOR EXERCISE TESTING, 1997; AMERICAN
COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000a)



  • The exercise test can assist in writing the exercise pre-
    scription. A symptom-limited test establishes a base-
    line fitness level and establishes a parameter for
    improving fitness. The ACSM recommends exercise
    intensities between 55 and 90% of HRmax, or 50–85%
    of VO2 max. The conditioning range for most adults to
    improve cardiorespiratory fitness is between 70 and
    85% of HRmax (65–80% VO2 max).


SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
IN ATHLETES



  • There are no specific indications for testing athletes,
    although they are tested occasionally for fitness and
    exercise prescription. The Bruce protocol, with gas
    exchange to establish a VO2 max, is most often
    employed. The Astrand, Costill, or ramp protocols
    may also be used (Marolf, Kuhn, and White, 2001).

  • Athletes manifest many differences than the general
    population both clinically and on EKG. They com-
    monly have increased ventricular volume and mass,
    along with sinus bradyarrhythmias. It is not uncom-
    mon to see certain EKG findings such as 1st degree
    AV blocks, right axis deviation, ventricular hypertro-
    phy with repolarization abnormalities, or incomplete
    right bundle branch block. All these findings are
    normal variants known as the athletic heart syndrome
    (Hughston, Puffer, and Rodney, 1985).

  • Interpretation of the exercise test in this population
    incorporates the same criteria as the general popula-
    tion; however, because of the variants stated above,
    there is a greater probability of a false positive test.


SUMMARY



  • The EST remains a valuable tool for diagnosing coro-
    nary artery disease, evaluating prognosis, and devel-
    oping an exercise prescription. By implementing the


test appropriately, the primary care physician can
enhance its validity and usefulness in clinical decision
making.

REFERENCES


ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing: A Report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise
Testing). JACC30(3):260–311, July 1997.
American College of Sports Medicine: Guidelines for Exercise
Testing and Prescription,6th ed. Baltimore, MD, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, 2000a, pp 22–32.
American College of Sports Medicine: Guidelines for Exercise
Testing and Prescription,6th ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, 2000b, pp 308–309.
American Diabetes Association: Clinical practice recommenda-
tions 2003: Physical activity/exercise and diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care 26(Suppl 1):S73–S77, 2003.
American Heart Association Scientific Statement: Exercise stan-
dards for testing and training. Circulation 104:1694–1740, 2001.
Borg G, Holmgren A, Lindblad I: Quantitative evaluation of chest
pain. Acta Med Scand 644:43–45, 1981.
Califf RKM, McKinnis RA, McNeer M, et al: Prognostic value
of ventricular arrhythmias for suspected ischemic heart dis-
ease. J Am Coll Cardiol2:1060–1067, 1983.
Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow EJ, et al: Heart rate recovery
immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl
J Med341:1351–1357, 1999.
Diamond GA, Forrester JS: Analysis of probability as an aid in
the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med
300:1350–1358, 1979.
Ellestad MH: Stress Testing: Principles and Practice,4th ed.
Philadelphia, PA, FA Davis, 1996a, pp 327–328.
Ellestad MH: Stress Testing: Principles and Practice,4th ed.
Philadelphia, PA, FA Davis, 1996b, pp 337–339.
Ellestad MH: Stress Testing: Principles and Practice, 4th ed.
Philadelphia, PA, FA Davis, 1996c, pp 565–569.
Evans CH, Froelicher VF: Some common abnormal responses to
exercise testing: What to do when you see them. Prim Care
28:219–231, 2001.
Evans CH, Harris G, Ellestad MH: A basic approach to the inter-
pretation of the exercise test. Prim Care28:73–98, 2001.
Evans CH, Karunarante HB: Exercise stress testing for the family
physician. Part I, Performing the Test. Am Fam Physician
45:121–132, 1992a.
Evans CH, Karunarante HB: Exercise stress testing for the family
physician. Part II, Interpretation of the results. Am Fam
Physician45:679–688, 1992b.
Fardy PS, Yanowitz FG, Wilson PK: Cardiac Rehabilitation,
Adult Fitness, and Exercise Testing,2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA,
Lea & Febiger, 1988.
Froelicher VF, Myers J: Exercise and the Heart,4th ed. St. Louis,
MO, Mosby-YearBook, 2000, pp 113–117.
Froelicher VF, Fearon W, Ferguson C, et al: Lessons learned from
studies of the standard exercise test? Chest116:1442–1451, 1999.
Free download pdf