Sports Medicine: Just the Facts

(やまだぃちぅ) #1
This results in eccentric hypertrophy with a more
pronounced increase in wall thickness than expected.


  • The strength-trained athlete adapts by developing a
    concentric hypertrophy with an increase in absolute
    and relative wall thickness without significant
    changes in end-diastolic diameter.


PHYSICAL EXAMINATION



  • The heart rate of well-conditioned athletes is usually
    between 40 and 60 bpm, secondary to enhanced vagal
    tone and decreased sympathetic tone. Normal sinus
    arrhythmia may be more noticeable.

  • The physiologic splitting of S2 may be slightly
    delayed during inspiration. An S3 may be noted in
    endurance-trained athletes secondary to the increased
    rate of left ventricular filling associated with the rela-
    tive left ventricular dilatation (Zeppilli, 1988).

  • While an S4 may be noted in strength-trained athletes
    secondary to concentric hypertrophy, its presence
    always warrants clinical evaluation. Functional mur-
    murs may be noted in 30–50% of athletes on careful
    examination (Huston, Puffer, and Rodney, 1985).


ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC CHANGES


•Several minor electrocardiogaphic variations have
been commonly noted in highly trained athletes and
are considered to be consistent with the athlete’s heart
syndrome (Huston, Puffer, and Rodney, 1985; Oakley
and Oakley, 1982) (Tables 25-1 and 25-2).



  • More significantly abnormal appearing electrocardio-
    gram(EKG) patterns have also been identified in other-
    wise normal athletic hearts. In a recent Italian study
    (Pelliccia et al, 2000), 1005 athletes were consecu-
    tively assessed with EKGs and echocardiograms. The
    study found that 40% of the athletes had abnormal
    EKGs, not including the minor alterations associated
    with the athlete’s heart syndrome mentioned above. Of
    these athletes, 36% had distinctlyabnormal patterns. Of
    those with the distinctly abnormal patterns, only 10%
    actually had evidence of structural cardiac disease,
    suggesting that the EKG manifestation of the normal
    athletic heart is much more variable than previously
    believed.


SUDDEN DEATH IN EXERCISE


  • While there is considerable net cardiovascular benefit
    to exercise, there is also a clear risk for susceptible
    individuals. Indeed, as Barry J. Maron (Maron, 2000)
    has clearly shown, there is a “paradox of exercise”
    that requires a clinical assessment of risk prior to the
    initiation of a vigorous program.
    •Overall risk of sudden death during exercise is low.
    Estimates from various studies (Siscovick et al, 1984;
    Ragosta et al, 1984; Thompson et al, 1982; Maron,
    Poliac, and Roberts, 1996; Van et al, 1995; Maron,
    Gohman, and Aeppli, 1998) range from 1:15,000 jog-
    gers per year (Siscovick et al, 1984; Thompson et al,
    1982) to 1:50,000 marathon participants (Maron,
    Poliac, and Roberts, 1996). For high school and col-
    lege-aged athletes the range is estimated at 1:200,000
    to 1:300,000 per academic year (Van camp et al, 1995;
    Maron, Gohman, and Aeppli, 1998).

  • The specific etiologies contributing to sudden cardiac
    death are most closely related to age. Generally, the
    dividing age is 35 (Basilico, 1999). This primarily stems
    from the observation that for sudden deaths over age 35,
    over 75% are associated with coronary artery disease.
    The high prevalence of atherosclerosis in this age group
    clearly predominates as an etiology.

  • In younger athletes, nonobstructive hypertrophic car-
    diomyopathy(HCM) is the most common etiology.
    Coronary artery anomalies, myocarditis, premature
    atherosclerotic disease, and dilated cardiomyopathy
    are next most common, at least in the United States.
    In European studies (Tabib et al, 1999; Firoozi et al,
    2002; Priori et al, 2002), arrhythmogenic right ven-
    tricular cardiomyopathy(ARVC) is more commonly
    recognized as an etiology than it is in the United
    States. Other less common etiologies include aortic
    rupture from Marfan’s syndrome, genetic conductive
    system abnormalities, idiopathic concentric left ven-
    tricular hypertrophy, substance abuse (cocaine or
    steroids), aortic stenosis, mitral valve prolapse,


TABLE 25-2 Rhythm Disturbances on Resting
Electrocardiograms of the General Population and Athletes
GENERAL
ARRHYTHMIA POPULATION (%) ATHLETES (%)
Sinus bradycardia 23.7 50–85
Sinus arrhythmia 2.4–20 13.5–69
Wandering atrial pacemaker — 7.4–19
First degree block 0.65 6–33
Second degree block — —
Mobitz I 0.003 0.125–10
Mobitz II 0.003 Not reported
Third degree block 0.0002 0.017
Nodal rhythm 0.06 0.031–7
Ventricular pre-excitation 0.1–0.15 0.15–2.5
Atrial fibrillation 0.004 0–0.063

142 SECTION 3 • MEDICAL PROBLEMS IN THE ATHLETE


TABLE 25-1 Common ECG Findings in Athletic
Heart Syndrome
Sinus bradycardia Sinus arrhythmia
First-degree AV block Wenckebach AV block
Incomplete RBBB Notched P waves
RVH by voltage criteria LVH by voltage criteria
Repolarization changes QTc interval at upper limit
Tall, peaked and inverted t waves

Free download pdf