Sports Medicine: Just the Facts

(やまだぃちぅ) #1
CHAPTER 75 • COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 457

however, the potential for severe herb–herb and
drug–herb interactions—including serotonin syn-
drome—is greater with SJW. SJW can accelerate
the metabolism of drugs cleared by the P450
enzyme system and should not be used by those on
immunosuppressants or antiviral medications
without monitoring.


  1. Regulated/Banned: Not banned by athletic regula-
    tory agencies; however, due to the risk of serious
    drug interactions, the distribution of SJW was
    recently banned in France. The governments of
    Japan, the United Kingdom and other European
    countries are considering similar bans.

  2. Conclusion: In monitored patients with mild–mod-
    erate depression, SJW therapy is acceptable ifthe
    patient has a simple, compatible medical regimen
    and strongly prefers SJW to conventional drug
    treatment.
    •Creatine (Williams, Kreider, and Branch, 1999; Volek
    et al, 1999; Vandenberghe et al, 1997)

  3. Primary use: Decrease workout recovery time;
    improve muscular strength/athletic performance
    2.Evidence: Many studies document increases in
    repetitive strength tasks of less than 30 s duration.
    Certain individuals who have low baseline levels of
    creatine may experience a more pronounced effect.

  4. Toxicity: Common side effects include GI upset,
    diarrhea, and mild muscle cramping. Case reports
    have attempted to implicate creatine in everything
    from cardiomyopathy to renal failure to rhab-
    domyolysis, but these effects are difficult to distin-
    guish from the effects of volume depletion and
    heat illness. Creatine’s ergogenic effects are
    largely negated by caffeine consumption.

  5. Regulated/Banned: Not a banned substance, but
    the National Collegiate Athletic Association
    (NCAA) prohibits universities from providing cre-
    atine for their athletes.

  6. Conclusion: A discussion of risks and benefits is
    critical to creatine. After thorough discussion with
    an athlete, creatine use can be permitted in other-
    wise healthy patients involved in strength-related
    events. Creatine should not be used in pediatric
    athletes (unclear safety), athletes with kidney dis-
    ease, or athletes prone to dehydration (osmotic
    action of creatine predisposes to dehydration and
    intensifies subsequent heat illness). For most ath-
    letes, creatine has no proven benefit. In fact, the
    increased body mass (2–4 kg) caused by creatine
    supplementation may impair performance in
    endurance events.



  • Homeopathy (Arnica) (Ernst and Barnes, 1998;
    Vickers et al, 1997; Tveiten et al, 1995; Vickers et al,







  1. Primary use: Relief of delayed onset muscle sore-
    ness (DOMS).

  2. Evidence: Homeopathic arnica is more properly
    viewed as an alternative medical system with many
    distinct, pharmacologic interventions. No single
    homeopathic treatment has been conclusively
    proven to be effective in reducing DOMS. Small
    trials of diverse remedies offer contradictory con-
    clusions for homeopathy in DOMS. Poor design,
    differing methodologies, and differing definitions
    of DOMS predictably plague these trials.

  3. Toxicity: No side effects above placebo levels have
    been reported. Reports of severe allergic reactions
    appear to be rare. Extreme dilution of homeopathic
    remedies makes direct toxicity highly unlikely.

  4. Regulated/Banned: No. A few states credential
    homeopathic physicians.

  5. Conclusion: The homeopathic system of medicine
    is complex and has not yet been adequately evalu-
    ated; however, its costs and toxicities are low in the
    hands of trained professionals.



  • Acupuncture (Green et al, 2002; Tulder et al, 2002;
    NIH, 1997; Garvey, Marks, and Wiesel, 1989)



  1. Primary use: Relief of low back pain and lateral
    elbow pain.

  2. Evidence: Like homeopathic arnica, acupuncture
    may be considered as a separate medical system.
    For lateral elbow pain, a recent Cochrane review
    found insufficient evidence to make any recom-
    mendations. RCTs of acupuncture for low back
    pain are contradictory and poorly designed.
    Acupuncture has been proven effective in reducing
    pain and relief of nausea.
    3.Toxicity: Broken needles, pneumothorax and
    infectious disease transmission are anecdotally
    reported, but unlikely in the hands of licensed pro-
    fessionals. Pain, fatigue, bleeding, and fainting are
    the most common side effects.

  3. Regulated/Banned: No. Over 30 states license
    acupuncturists. The FDA has approved acupunc-
    ture needles as experimental devices.

  4. Conclusion: Given the paucity of evidence, the
    Cochrane review recommends that effective,
    proven treatments be considered before acupunc-
    ture; however, the costs and risks are sufficiently
    low that acupuncture use—under the care of a
    trained professional—can be permitted.



  • Chondroitin (Leeb et al, 2000; Leffler et al, 1999;
    Towheed and Anastassiades, 2000)



  1. Primary use: Improving pain and stiffness from
    OA.

  2. Evidence: Several trials suggest (size and design
    limiting) that chondroitin and ibuprofen are more
    effective than ibuprofen alone for improving OA

Free download pdf