Sports Medicine: Just the Facts

(やまだぃちぅ) #1

  • Normal angle opens laterally.
    •Parallel or medial opening associated with patellar
    subluxation/dislocation.


FOOT AND ANKLE


BOHLER’SANGLE



  • Lateral foot or ankle.

  • Angle formed by the intersection of a line drawn from
    posterosuperior margin of the calcaneal tuberosity
    and a line drawn from the tip of the posterior facet
    through the superior margin of the anterior process of
    the calcaneus.

  • Used in evaluation of possible calcaneal fractures.

  • Normal: 20–40°


GISSANE’SANGLE



  • Lateral foot or ankle.

  • Angle of the articulation of the talus and calcaneus.

  • Used in evaluation of possible calcaneal fractures with
    subsequent subtalar instability.

  • Normal: 120–145°.


INTERMETATARSALANGLE



  • AP foot.

  • Line drawn through axis of 1st and 2nd metatarsals.

  • Normal: <9°

  • If >15° and correcting hallux valgus, proximal
    metatarsal osteotomy may be required.


FIRSTMETATARSALANGLE



  • AP foot.

  • Line drawn through axis of 1st metatarsal and proxi-
    mal phalanx.

  • Normal: <20°

  • Increased in hallux valgus.


AP TALOCALCANEALANGLE(KITE’SAP ANGLE)



  • AP foot.

  • Longitudinal axis of talus and longitudinal axis of cal-
    caneus.

  • Normal: 20–40°

  • Decreased in clubfoot and hindfoot varus.


ANTERIORDRAWERSTRESSRADIOGRAPH



  • Anterior ankle drawer is performed by the examiner.

  • Radiograph is taken during stressof the anterior drawer.

  • Comparison is made with unaffected ankle.

    • Measure the shortest distance between the talar dome
      and the posterior margin of the tibial articular surface.

    • Anterior translation >8 mm or 5 mm greater than the
      unaffected side.




TALARTILTSTRESSRADIOGRAPH
•Talar tilt is performed by the examiner.


  • Radiograph is taken during stress of the talar tilt.

  • Comparison is made with unaffected ankle.

  • Angle is measured between two lines drawn along
    tibial plafond and talar dome.

  • Normal is <15°or a difference of <10°when com-
    pared to the normal size.


BIBLIOGRAPHY


Casillas MM: Ligament injuries of the foot and ankle in adult ath-
letes, in DeLee JC, Drez D, Miller MD (eds.): DeLee and
Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Principles and Practice,
2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 2003.
Coughlin MJ: Conditions of the forefoot, in DeLee JC, Drez D,
Miller MD (eds.): DeLee and Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports
Medicine Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA,
Saunders, 2003.
Eiff MP, Hatch RL, Calmbach WL: Fracture Management for
Primary Care. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1998.
Greenspan, Adam: Orthopedic Radiology: A Practical Approach,
3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkens,
2000.
Hak DJ, Gautsch TL: A review of radiographic lines and angles
in orthopedics. Am J Orthop, Aug 1999.
Herman MJ, Pizzutillo PD: Cervical spine disorders in children.
Orthop Clin North Am- 30(3):457–466, Jul. 01, 1999.
Keats, TE, Sistrom, C: Atlas of Radiologic Measurement. St.
Louis, MO, Mosby, 2001.
Larsen CF, Mathiesen FK, Lindequist S: Measurements of carpal
bone angles on lateral wrist radiographs. J Hand Surg
16A:888–893, 1991.
Magee, David J: Orthopedic Physical Assessment, 3rd ed.
Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1997.
McAlindon, Robert J: On field evaluation and management of
head and neck injured athletes. Clin Sports Med21(1):1–14,
Jan 2002.
Simon RR, Koenigsknecht SJ: Emergency Orthopedics. East
Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange, 1987.
Wimberly RL, Lauerman WC: Sponylolisthesis in the Athelte.
Clin Sports Med 21(1):133–145, Jan. 2002.

614 APPENDIX

Free download pdf