5.2. QUARK MODEL 277
can also be decomposed in the form
(5.2.36) H(U) =H 1 (U)⊕ ··· ⊕HK(U) ∀U∈SU(N),
andHj(U) ( 1 ≤j≤K)are as in (5.2.23), such that
(5.2.37) Hj(U):Ej→Ej, dimEj=mj ( 1 ≤j≤K).
In other words, the subspaceEjof (5.2.35) is invariant for the linear transformation (5.2.36)-
(5.2.37).
7.Sakata’s explanation of irreducible representation of SU(N).Now, we can deduce the
following physical conclusions from the discussions in above Steps 1-6.
Physical Explanation 5.5.Let (5.2.29) be a family of composite particles as given by (5.2.30).
The irreducible representation (5.2.36), which usually is expressed as
N︸⊗ ··· ⊗︷︷ N︸
k 1
⊗N︸⊗ ··· ⊗︷︷ N︸
k 2
=m 1 ⊕ ··· ⊕mK,
means that
- the composite particle system (5.2.29) can be classified into K groups of particles:
Gj={Ψ 1 j,···,Ψmjj}, 1 ≤j≤K;
- each group Gjhas mjparticles, such that under the state transformation (5.2.27)-
(5.2.28) of fundamental particles:
U:CN→CN, U:C
N
→C
N
(U∈SU(N)),
the particles in Gjonly transform between themselves as in (5.2.37).
We now examine the Physical Explanation5.5from the mathematical viewpoint. The
Nk(k=k 1 +k 2 )elements of (5.2.29)-(5.2.30) form a basis ofCN
k 1
⊗C
Nk^2
.We denote these
elements as
(5.2.38) E={Ψ 1 ,···,ΨNk},
with eachΨjas in (5.2.30). The irreducible representation (5.2.23):
AH(U)A−^1 =H 1 (U)⊕ ··· ⊕HK(U), ∀U∈SU(N)
implies that if we take the basis transformation for (5.2.38)
(5.2.39)
Ψ ̃ 1
..
.
Ψ ̃Nk
=A
Ψ 1
..
.
ΨNk