International Human Resource Management-MJ Version

(Ann) #1

A comparison of surveys conducted into traditional and progressive performance appraisal
practices rated for current and future use. The study highlights the need to contextualize per-
formance management, particularly with regard to the provision of performance feedback and
whether to focus on the individual or the group.



  • • Brewster, C. and Harris, H. (eds) (1999) International HRM: Contemporary Issues in
    Europe.London: Routledge.
    This text provides number of interesting articles from a European perspective that extend dis-
    cussion of IHRM strategy and functions.

  • • Lowe, K., Milliman, J., De Cieri, H. and Dowling, P. (2002) ‘International compensation
    practices: a ten-country comparative analysis’,Asia Pacific Journal of Human
    Resources,40 (1): 55–78.
    This is a special edition of the journal reporting the Best Practice in International HRM col-
    laborative 10-country/regional analysis covering several IHRM functions, including compen-
    sation and performance appraisal as well as convergence and divergence and the role of
    HRM.

  • • O’Donnell, S. (1999) ‘Compensation design as a tool for implementing foreign sub-
    sidiary strategy’,Management International Review, 39 (2): 149–165.
    A detailed discussion and testing of agency theory in the context of international compensa-
    tion. See also Roth and O’Donnell (1996).


REFERENCES

Albright, M.D. and Levy, P.E. (1995) ‘The effects of source credibility and performance rating
discrepancy on reactions to multiple raters’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25:
577–600.
Armstrong, M. (1994) Performance Management.London: Kogan Page.
Balkin, D.B. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (1987) ‘Toward a contingency theory of compensation
strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 8: 169–182.
Barney, J. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of
Management, 17(1): 19–120.
Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1992) ‘Developing coordination and control: the organizational
challenge’, in C.A. Bartlett and S. Ghoshal (eds), Transnational Management: Text, Cases
and Readings in Cross-border Management.Homewood, Ill: Irwin. pp. 468–86.
Bernthal, P.R. (1996) ‘Comparing performance management practices in the United States and
Pacific Rim’, Advances in International Comparative Management, 11: 1–29.
Bevan, S. and Thompson, M. (1991) ‘Performance Management at the cross-roads’, Personnel
Management, 23: 36–39.


International Compensation and Performance Management 329
Free download pdf