Cultural Geography

(Nora) #1
over he returned to New Mexico and, following
a riding accident, decided to match the European
geography publications with an American
version that was to become Landscape. The
first issue was published in Spring 1951. In his
early essays Jackson outlined the importance
and pleasure of careful observation. ‘I see
things very clearly and I rely on what I see,’ he
explained, ‘And I see things that other people
don’t see, and I call their attention to it’
(Horowitz, 1997: xxiv). By 1956 Jackson was
in close contact with the Geography Depart-
ment at Berkeley, and Sauer (as well as
Clarence Glacken, Lewis Mumford, Kevin
Lynch and others) began to write for the jour-
nal, developing a multidisciplinary and maver-
ick conception of the study of landscape.
Jackson continued to criss-cross the United
States on his motorbike and in his pickup truck
and frequently wrote about the landscape from
the perspective of a mobile observer. It is in
these essays that the dualism of vision and
practice breaks down.
If the equation that links landscape to vision
has frequently erased practice, then J.B. Jackson’s
mobile view of landscape began to show how
vision is a practice. J.B Jackson’s way of looking
is so much less reliant on that distanced gaze
from above and so much more practised – more
embodied. One of the best essays in this regard
is ‘The abstract world of the hot rodder’. He
introduces us to the world of the pedestrian
Sunday. Families would leave their homes on
Sunday morning complete with all the acces-
sories of really leisurely leisure. They would take
the street car to some ‘favorite patch’ and walk
into the distance ‘strolling at a child’s pace’.
Jackson declares these Sunday excursions a lost
treasure which inspired ‘schools of painting
and writing and music ... Untold minor scientific
and artistic accomplishments came from the
same abundant source; local botanical and geo-
graphical and historical descriptions, small
books of nature verse, amateur sketches and
compositions.’ Despite this romantic notion of a
weekend stroll he declares it mere nostalgia to
think in those terms in the modern world because
the nature of viewing – the way it is embodied –
has changed.

Much more has happened to us than the advent of the
automobile; we have learned to see the world differ-
ently even on our holidays; we confront the familiar set-
ting in a new manner. Broadly speaking, the former
experience of nature was contemplative and static. It
came while we strolled (at three miles an hour or less)

through country paths with frequent halts for picking
flowers, observing wildlife, and admiring the view.
Repose and reflection in the midst of undisturbed natural
beauty and a glimpse of something remote were what we
chiefly prized. I do not wish to decry the worth of these
pleasures; none were ever more fruitful in their time; but
the layman’s former relationship to nature ... was largely
determined by a kind of classical perspective and by awe.
A genuine sense of worship precluded any desecration,
but it also precluded any desire for participation, and
intuition that man also belonged. (1997: 202)

Jackson goes on to develop the idea of partici-
pation in an ‘abstract world’ brought on by tech-
nologies of speed such as the motorbike and
increasingly popular outdoor pursuits such as
skiing. Rather then standing back and looking,
the hot rodders take part in the landscape. They
experience it through embodied practice. A
similar perspective is at the heart of his later
essay ‘The accessible landscape’ (1988), in
which Jackson describes the view through the
window of his favourite pickup truck as he dri-
ves through America’s vernacular heartland –
not the static view from on high but a moving
perspective more typical of the everyday prac-
tice of American life. Many years earlier in
‘Other-directed houses’ Jackson celebrated the
highway strip as a place of pleasure and diver-
sion for the motorist, pointing out, 16 years
before Venturi et al.’s Learning from Las Vegas,
that the buildings on the strip have to be
designed for a kind of vision that travelled at 40
miles per hour – vision as a particular kind of
historically specific practice.

Thinking Practice

‘Practice’ is a term which has begun to make
a significant impact on cultural geography. Its
origins are in critical theory, performance studies,
feminism and post-Marxist social theory. On the
whole it has been absent from landscape studies.
It is already clear that to talk of ‘practice’ can
mean quite different things to different people. I
began this chapter with the observation that the
notion of landscapes of practice was based on
oxymoronic logic. Landscape, as we have seen,
is predominantly thought of as a visual thing – as
an image. It is also thought of as material and
fixed – a kind of framing. Practice on the other
hand is most frequently seen as radically unfixed
and unfixable.
Theories of practice from Bourdieu to Judith
Butler to Nigel Thrift are indebted to the work of
Maurice Merleau-Ponty. He was particularly

LANDSCAPE AND THE OBLITERATION OF PRACTICE 275

3029-ch13.qxd 03-10-02 4:53 PM Page 275

Free download pdf