Cultural Geography

the slower structural tendencies tied to

technoscientific modernity – relentless techno-

scientificchange, turbulent capitalist globaliza-

tion, unstable energy markets, failing states

and systems, emerging diseases, proliferating

weapons of mass destruction and environ-

mental degradation – and the persistence of

territorial struggles within and between

nation-states in the interstate system that will

continue to delimit the struggles over cultural

geopolitics in the twenty-first century.

REFERENCES

Agnew, J. (1984) ‘An excess of national exceptionalism:

towards a political geography of American foreign

policy’,Political Geography Quarterly 2: 151–66.

Agnew, J. (1997) Political Geography. A Reader.

London: Arnold.

Agnew, J. and Corbridge, S. (1995) Mastering Space:

Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy.

London: Routledge.

Agnew, J., Mitchell, K. and Toal, G. (eds) (2002) A Companion

to Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ash, T.G. (2001) ‘Europe at war’,The New York Review of

BooksXLVIII (20 December): 66–8.

Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.

Dalby, S. (2002) Environmental Security. Minneapolis:

University of Minnesota Press.

Duncan, J. (1980) ‘The superorganic in American cultural

geography’,Annals of the Association of American Geo-

graphers 70: 181–98.

Godlewska, A. and Smith, N. (eds) (1984) Geography and

Empire. Oxford: Blackwell.

Huntington, S. (1997) The Clash of Civilizations and the

Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Jackson, P. (1989) Maps of Meaning: An Introduction to

Cultural Geography. London: Routledge.

Lewis, M. and Wigen, K. (1997) The Myth of Continents:

A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley: University of

California Press.

Luke, T. (2002) ‘Postmodern geopolitics: the case of the

9/11 attacks’, in J. Agnew, K. Mitchell and G. Toal (eds)

A Companion to Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.

O Loughlin, J. (1986) ‘Spatial models of international con-

flicts: extending current theories of war behavior’,

Annals of the Association of American Geographers

76: 63–80.

Ó Tuathail, G. (1996) Critical Geopolitics. Minneapolis:

University of Minnesota Press.

Ó Tuathail, G. (2000) ‘The postmodern geopolitical condi-

tion: states, statecraft, and security at the millennium’,

Annals of the Association of American Geographers90 (1):

166–78.

Ó Tuathail, G. and Agnew, J. (1992) ‘Geopolitics and dis-

course: practical geopolitical reasoning and American

foreign policy’,Political Geography11: 155–75.

Paasi, A. (1996) Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness.

Chichester:Wiley.

Parker, G. (1998) Geopolitics: Past, Present and Future.

London: Pinter.

Sharp, J.P. (2000) Condensing the Cold War: Reader’s Digest

and American Identity. Minneapolis: University of

Minnesota Press.

Smith, G. (1999) ‘The masks of Proteus: Russia, geopolitical

shift and the new Eurasianism’.Transactions of the Insti-

tute of British Geographers 24 (NS): 481–500.

Smith, N. (1989) ‘Geography as museum: private history

and conservative idealism in The Nature of Geography’,

in J.N. Entrikin and S. Brunn (eds) Reflections on Richard

Hartshorne’s The Nature of Geography. Washington:

Association of American Geographers. pp. 89–120.

Sparke, M. (forthcoming) Hyphenated Nation-States. Min-

neapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Thrift, N. (2000) ‘It’s the little things’, in K. Dodds and

D. Atkinson (eds) Geopolitical Traditions. London:

Routledge.

INTRODUCTION 461

Section-8.qxd 03-10-02 10:43 AM Page 461