Cultural Geography

(Nora) #1
BOUNDARIES IN A GLOBALIZING WORLD 463

of the boundary, supplementingthe power of the
state. The number of crossing points has increased
dramatically, being now more than 20. The border,
however, has not disappeared and is still controlled,
but now in less exclusive ways, displaying the
changing meanings of boundaries and territoriality.
Further, it is not only a state-to-state border but
also the sole border between the EU and Russia
and one of the deepest divides in the world as far
as the standards of living in the respective states
are concerned.
Most people outside Finland may not know
that Oulu is one of the central bases of operation
of Nokia, a traditional Finnish manufacturing
firm that has rapidly become the most significant
name in the mobile phone marketplace. Its slogan
‘Nokia – connecting people’ celebrates the oppo-
site of boundaries and borders. With R&D centres
in 15 countries on four continents, products sold
in 130 states, and more than 90 per cent of its
stock owned by foreigners, Nokia is a global
company that has apparently transcended the
borders of the nation-state. Along with the rise
of Nokia and other high-tech firms, Oulu has
become increasingly international, partly because
of the links between these firms and the univer-
sity, both of which draw educated people to the
city, many of them crossing the borders between
states, cultures and social roles. The city is the
centre of the province of Northern Ostrobothnia,
which means that much of the regional decision
making within the context of the EU is located

there, again passing national boundaries. This
relativitization of the location of Oulu during the
1990s seems to illustrate the changing functions
of political boundaries in a globalizing network-
ing world. Superficially at least, it seems to
support arguments about the disappearance of
borders and nation-states in a world character-
ized by networking people, transnational corpo-
rations and suprastate levels of governance
(Ohmae, 1995).
However, the disappearance of boundaries has
been more celebrated in the catchy logos of
transnational corporations than realized in prac-
tice. Boundaries are dense and multilayered
processes whose meanings derive not merely
from economic forces (or slogans!) but also from
the accumulated histories and cultures of politi-
cal entities that are still very much alive: states.
The world political map is made up of almost
200 different states. Between them are hundreds
of boundaries, some open and peaceful, some
closed and full of political dynamite. All of these
borders are human creations and a good number
of them have contested stories of identity, struggle,
desire and history embedded in their existence
(Kirby, 1996). As the Finnish–Swedish and
Finnish–Russian borders demonstrate, even
different boundaries of the same state may have
diverging, historically contingent narratives
of identity associated with them. These narra-
tives and their everyday meanings may also vary
in the socio-spatial consciousness of various

Figure 24.1 The Berlin Wall 2000

3029-ch24.qxd 03-10-02 11:03 AM Page 463

Free download pdf