Cultural Geography

(Nora) #1
unstable and thus open to the possibility of
change, whether it be with styles of architecture,
libidos or cities.
These types of feminist and queer works, in
addition to feminist contributions in the field of
ethics (see Diprose, 1994; Gatens, 1993;
Shildrick, 1997; Weiss, 1999), suggest that the
body as a site for theory development is indeed
abundant. Such is the case for other social
science disciplines. In sociology, bringing the
body ‘back in’ (signalled by key works such as
Frank, 1989, and Zola, 1991) spawned even
more feminist interest in various bodies: the
surgically altered body (Davis, 1995); the body
under surveillance (Howson, 1998); and the body
of gender difference (Lindeman, 1997). Feminist
anthropologists, too, have explored understand-
ings of gender and the body in terms of scientific
knowledge, binary thinking, health and cultural
activities (see, for example, Aalton, 1997;
Martin, 1992a; 1992b; 1994). As well, feminist
anthropologists are providing embodied alter-
natives to traditional ethnographic fieldwork,
though not necessarily explicitly locating the
work within the body literature (see, for example,
Barillas, 1999; Dossa, 1999; Williams, 1996). In
psychology, outside the predominance of a real-
ist, empirically driven perspective, feminists are
pursuing more contextual explanations of the
body. Negotiating the discursive and material
binary, feminist psychologists and psycho-
analysts interested in queer theory are posing
possible alternatives to conventional counselling
and political action (see, for example, chapters in
Ussher, 1997a, especially Squire, 1997; Stoppard,
1997; and Ussher, 1997b; 1997c).
Geography is much like these other social
science disciplines. Geographers have demon-
strated that bodies have a history and a geography
(Nast and Pile, 1998; Teather, 1999). Questions
of body and embodiment are being pursued by
those working in the critical vein of the disci-
pline – feminists, socialists, Marxists, queer
theorists, psychoanalytic theorists and poststruc-
turalists. Social and cultural geographers have
engaged with the body and embodiment histori-
cally, economically, culturally and in health.
Feminist, poststructural and psychoanalytic work
with the influence of cultural studies have been
central in the deconstruction of a unitary body
(as well as subject, subjectivity and identity; see
Section 5 in this volume), bringing to the fore-
front power, gender and sexuality in analyses of
body and embodiment. The materiality of the
body has been counterposed against the body
as a surface of inscription, as a readable text.
Although there has been less engagement with
classed and racialized bodies, the body in

economic production in Marxist analyses and the
role of ‘whiteness’ in the construction of the
other in postcolonial studies are increasing.
These are the types of works we are interested
in reviewing to show how geographers are
embodying social geography. How have geo-
graphers used geographical concepts, such as
space, place and scale, in constructing under-
standings of body and embodiment? The body as
a scaleof investigation, whether in geopolitics,
urban studies or studies of the natural environ-
ment, has implications for methodology in that
studies of articulations of the body with society
may presuppose particular types of research, as
for example, ethnographic methods for under-
standing everyday life or depth interviews for
bodily inscriptions. How do geographers break
the confines of scale? Or do they need to? A
focus on lived experience through spatiality
grounds investigations of the body in the every-
day, bringing abstract subjects/bodies into the
materiality of life in specific spaces and loca-
tions. Holding theorizing body in tension with an
embodied knowledge poses additional questions
not only in the sense of how these works have
contributed to an embodiedgeographical knowl-
edge, but also in how working with embodied
knowledge contributes to understanding and
explaining how bodies exist in various contexts.

INTELLECTUAL PASSAGES

Emerging through this tension between creating
theory about the body and working from embodied
knowledge are three key intellectual passages,
around which we group our review of work
about the body in social and cultural geography:
examining the body as a site of regulation,
oppression and control; delving into embodied
subjectivity and spatiality; and challenging
binary categories through problematizing the
body. Much like Eleonore Kofman’s (1994)
assertion that research agendas brought forward
in the 1980s remain unfinished, we propose a
similar heuristic device referring to an unfinished
grouping of body works as intellectual passages.

The body as a site of regulation, oppression
and control

Many works in social and cultural geography
draw on the notion that categories like gender,
race, sexuality and disability are not to be taken
for granted, but instead are to be thought of as
constructed through social relations of power, via

62 RETHINKING THE SOCIAL

3029-ch02.qxd 03-10-02 11:39 AM Page 62

Free download pdf