- update knowledge banks with consequently realigned approaches to human
sexuality along with pertinent educational applications; - Professionally stream Human Resources according to natural and man-made
differences and deviations between men and women and the various “Other
Genders.” - Abandon stereotypes for the reality orientation of scientific knowledge
conjoined to Fiqh Jurisprudence of the highest caliber. - Gender Archetypes need to be definitively re-examined and presented
intelligently
In view of the seriousness of these disclosures, professionally pretentious
Turbanites will not do, especially those who identify with sectarian
cognomens other than “Muslim.” Furthermore, as it is heterosexuals who
comprise the overwhelming majority (90%) of human’s committing sexual
crimes against heaven, there is little merit in an extremist moral perspective
being adopted during any review of public policies related to the conundrums
presented.
I will now attempt to describe some aspects of Male and Female Archetypes,
insh’Allah.
The Husband’s Call
Since the soul clearly does not choose its
sexuality, it is the body that directs the soul’s
attentions vis-à-vis its physical preparation in the
womb. The soul is a kind of victim, captured and
taught by the body how to respond to all external
stimuli according to physiological (chemical) and anatomical (form)
compositions. This thesis obviously suggests that the soul is intrinsically
sexless. It appears that just as water flows down a mountain through ancient
channels to settle in lakes and drain into rivers, the soul’s sexual orientation
runs through pre-determined channels that are unyielding, even hard-wired
pathways in both brain and organ systems, which also include emotional
realms.
When a virile heterosexual male views an attractive lady, the response is