lengthened, and the pilasters above the spring of the arches were refixed
(those on either side of the central panel to that panel only). The sides of
the framework were chamfered to echo the shape of the columns, and
new central columns were made to cover the strips supporting the panels
on either side of the central panel. The columns, slotted behind the capi-
tals and held in place at the bottom by athin base plate screwed onto the
base of the framework, were prepared and gilded to match the rest of
the framing elements. The reframed altarpiece differed only in minute
detail from its previous appearance—yet the panels were unrestricted,
andthe frame could be easily dismantled and reassembled (Fig. 16).
It is hoped that these examples demonstrate a valid and flexible
approach to the framing of panels. The solutions devised here are not pre-
sented as models to be copied but, rather, as proposed methods that can
be adapted and improved.444 McClure
Figure 12, above
Pietro Gerini (attrib.), Triptych. Acqueous
medium on poplar panel, 165 3 180 cm.
Private collection. The condition before treat-
ment is shown.
Figure 13, abov e right
Pietro Gerini (attrib.), Triptych. Reverse
beforetreatment.
Figure 14, below
Pietro Gerini (attrib.), Triptych. Reverse
after treatment.
Figure 15, below right
Pietro Gerini (attrib.), Triptych. Diagram of
the framework.