chapter we will describe a recent theory that is able to integrate several differ-
ent aspects of similarity grouping in the process of texture segregation, but it
cannot yet handle other grouping principles such as common fate, continuity,
and closure.
8.1.2 New Principles of Grouping
There has been surprisingly little modern work on principles of perceptual
grouping in vision. Recently, however, three new grouping factors have been
proposed:synchrony (Palmer & Levitin, submitted),common region (Palmer,
1992) andelement connectedness(Palmer & Rock, 1994a).
The principle ofsynchronystates that, all else being equal, visual events that
occur at the same time will tend to be perceived as going together. Although
this factor has previously been acknowledged as important in auditory per-
ception (e.g., Bregman, 1978), it has not been systematically studied in vision
until recently (Palmer & Levitin, submitted). Figure 8.5 depicts an example.
Each element in an equally spaced row of black and white dots flickers at a
given rate between black and white. The arrows indicate that half the circles
change from black to white or from white to black at one time and the other
half at a different time. When the alternation rate is about 25 changes per sec-
ond or less, observers see the dots as strongly grouped into pairs based on
synchrony. At faster rates, there is no grouping in what appears to be chaotic
flickering of the dots. At very slow rates there is momentary grouping into
pairs at the moment of change, but it dissipates during the constant interval
between flickers. Synchrony is related to the classical principle of common fate
in the sense that it is a dynamic factor, but as this example shows, the ‘‘fate’’ of
theelementsdoesnothavetobecommon—somedotsgetbrighter,andothers
get dimmer—as long as the change occurs at the same time.
Another recently identified principle of grouping is common region (Palmer,
1992).Common regionrefers to the fact that, all else being equal (ceteris paribus),
elements that are located within the same closed region of space will be grouped
together. Figure 8.6A shows an example that is analogous to Wertheimer’s clas-
sic demonstrations (figures 8.2B–8.2E): A line of otherwise equivalent, equally
spaced dots is strongly organized into pairs when they are enclosed within the
Figure 8.4
Tradeoffs between grouping by color and proximity. Large differences in proximity and small dif-
ferences in color lead to grouping by proximity, whereas large differences in color and small differ-
ences in proximity lead to grouping by color.
Organizing Objects and Scenes 195