Foundations of Cognitive Psychology: Preface - Preface

(Steven Felgate) #1

(which I called streams) provide centers of description that connect sensory
features so that the right combinations can serve as the basis for recognizing
the environmental events. This was illustrated with three auditory phenomena,
the streaming effect, the decomposition of complex tones (the ABC experiment),
and perceptual closure through occluding sounds.
The explanation that I offered had two sides. It discussed both perceptual
representations and the properties of the acoustic input that were used heuris-
tically to do the segregation. I argued that one had to take the ecology of the
world of sound into account in looking for the methods that the auditory system
might be using, and claimed that this could serve as a powerful supplement
to the Gestalt theorist’s strategy of looking for formal similarities in the activity
of different senses. Finally I proposed that there were two kinds of constraints
on the formation of perceptual representations, unlearned primitive ones and
more sophisticated ones that existed in learned packages called schemas.


Notes



  1. For example, those described by Deutsch (1975a).

  2. From Guzman (1969).

  3. Bregman and Rudnicky (1975).

  4. Treisman and Schmidt (1982).

  5. Julesz and Hirsh (1972).

  6. Forms of this effect have been described by Vicario (1965, 1982) and Bregman and Achim (1973).

  7. See discussion in van Noorden (1975). A more elaborate form of Ko ̈rte’s law in audition has been
    offered by Jones (1976).

  8. Ogasawara (1936), Corbin (1942), and Attneave and Block (1973).

  9. Bregman and Mills (1982).

  10. See review in Warren (1982).

  11. Bregman and Pinker (1978).

  12. Cutting (1976).

  13. Anstis and Saida (1985).

  14. Shepard (1981).

  15. Demany (1982).


References


Anstis, S., and Saida, S. (1985). Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 257–271.
Attneave, F., and Block, G. (1973). Apparent movement in tridimensional space.Perception & Psy-
chophysics, 13, 301–307.
Bregman, A. S. (1981). Asking the ‘‘what for’’ question in auditory perception. In M. Kubovy and J.
R. Pomerantz (eds.),Perceptual Organization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Bregman, A. S., and Achim, A. (1973). Visual stream segregation.Perception & Psychophysics, 13,
451–454.
Bregman, A. S., and Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of
order in rapid sequences of tones.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 244–249.
Bregman, A. S., and Mills, M. I. (1982). Perceived movement: The Flintstone constraint.Perception,
11 , 201–206.
Bregman, A. S., and Pinker, S. (1978). Auditory streaming and the building of timbre.Canadian
Journal of Psychology, 32, 19–31.
Bregman, A. S., and Rudnicky, A. (1975). Auditory segregation: Stream or streams?Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 263–267.
Corbin, H. H. (1942). The perception of grouping and apparent movement in visual depth.Archives
of Psychology,no. 273.


The Auditory Scene 247
Free download pdf