untitled

(sharon) #1
fairness of the members. Each scientist
brings to the table a sense of what consti-
tutes excellence—in hypotheses, experi-
mental design, and impact. Applying
those standards throughout, and keeping
in check one’s biases—personal and scien-
tific—allow the study section to establish
high and firm standards as a group.


  • Clarity:reviews that convey effectively the
    reviewer’s analysis are extremely important.
    Reviews of high quality that are consistent
    with the score that the proposal receives
    enhance confidence in the system.

  • Persuasiveness:the ability to articulate
    crisply the qualities of a grant that under-
    lie one’s opinion of it matter in the meet-
    ing. The majority of study section mem-
    bers must rely upon the reviewers for
    a guide to both the proposal and the field
    it represents.


What’s in It for the
Study Section Member?

Most of those who have served as members
agree that they have enjoyed multiple bene-
fits from study section service:


  • The opportunity to contribute in a signif-
    icant way to the research enterprise.By
    putting themselves in a position to be an
    advocate for interesting and well-done sci-
    ence, they help lift the standards and per-
    formance of their fields.

  • The opportunity to learn how to write a
    better grant.Reading others’ proposals,
    good and bad, allows people to see what
    works and what doesn’t, how to present
    data, how to keep reviewers engaged, what
    sorts of traps to avoid. The common expe-


rience is that study section members’ pro-
posals get better and easier to write as a
result of their service.


  • The chance to participate in an intellectual
    experience of a high order.The analysis of a
    scientific program, and its relationship to a
    field, calls upon the reviewers’ intellect and
    training in a way that too few other activities
    do. Members also can learn a lot of science in
    a short time.

  • The opportunity to form relationships
    with new colleagues that carry on
    throughout one’s career.


Which Study Section
and When?
People usually join study section after being
invited to serve at a session or two as an ad
hocmember. The invitation comes from the
SRA (SRAs are notoriously on the prowl for
willing talent) acting on names received
from members of the study section past and
present and other scientists in the field.
These sessions give the study section and the
potential member a chance to find out if
they’re compatible. It’s a good idea to pick a
study section that deals primarily with sci-
ence relevant to one’s own interests. All
those hours in a meeting talking about things
that you don’t know or care about will make

Reading others’ proposals, good
and bad, allows people to see
what works and what doesn’t,
how to present data, how to keep
reviewers engaged, what sorts
of traps to avoid.

CHAPTER 7 • GRANTS 201

THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CELL BIOLOGY

Free download pdf