Food Biochemistry and Food Processing (2 edition)

(Wang) #1

BLBS102-c33 BLBS102-Simpson March 21, 2012 14:5 Trim: 276mm X 219mm Printer Name: Yet to Come


33 Biochemistry of Beer Fermentation 649

Kobayashi O et al. 1998. Region of Flo1 proteins responsible for
sugar recognition.J Bacteriol180: 6503–6510.
Kodama Y et al. 1995. Improvement of maltose fermentation effi-
ciency: constitutive expression ofMALgenes in brewing yeasts.
JAmSocBrewChem53: 24–29.
Kodama Y et al. 2001. Control of higher alcohol production by
manipulation of theBAP2gene in brewing yeast.J Am Soc Brew
Chem59: 57–62.
Kronl ̈of J, Linko M. 1992. Production of beer using immobilized
yeast encodingα-acetolactate decarboxylase.JInstBrew98:
479–491.
Kronl ̈of J, Virkaj ̈arvi I. 1999. Primary fermentation with immobi-
lized yeast. Proceedings of the European Brewery Convention
Congress, Cannes, pp. 761–770.
Kubo Y et al. 2000. Effect of gene disruption of succinate dehy-
drogenase on succinate production in sake yeast strain.J Biosci
Bioeng90: 619–624.
Kunze W. 1999.Technology of Brewing and Malting. VLB, Berlin.
Landaud S et al. 2001. Top pressure and temperature control of the
fusel alcohol/ester ratio through yeast growth in beer fermenta-
tion.JInstBrew10: 107–117.
Lagunas R. 1979. Energetic irrelevance of aerobiosis forS. cere-
visiaegrowing on sugars.Mol Cell Biochem27: 139–146.
Lea AH, Piggott JRP. 1995.Fermented Beverage Production.
Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow.
Lee S et al. 1995. Yeast strain development for enhanced production
of desirable alcohols/esters in beer.J Am Soc Brew Chem39:
153–156.
Li F, Palecek SP. 2003.EAP1,aCandida albicans gene in-
volved in binding human epithelial cells.Eukaryot Cell2:
1266–1273.
Lievense JC, Lim HC. 1982. The growth and dynamics ofSaccha-
romyces cerevisiae. In: GT Tsao et al. (eds.)Annual Reports on
Fermentation Processes. Academic Press, New York.
Lilly M et al. 2000. Effect of increased yeast alcohol acetyltrans-
ferase activity on flavor profiles of wine and distillates.Appl
Environ Microbiol66: 744–753.
Lilly M et al. 2006. The effect of increased branched-chain amino
acid transaminase activity in yeast on the production of higher
alcohols and on the flavour profiles of wine and distillates.FEMS
Yeast Res6: 726–743.
Linko M et al. 1993. Use of brewer’s yeast expressingα-acetolactate
decarboxylase in conventional and immobilized fermentations.
MBAA Tech Quart30: 93–97.
Linko M et al. 1997. Main fermentation with immobilized yeast—a
breaktrough? Proceedings of the European Brewery Convention
Congress, Maastricht, pp. 385–394.
Linko M et al. 1998. Recent advances in the malting and brewing
industry.J Biotechnol65: 85–98.
Lo WS, Dranginis AM. 1998. The cell surface flocculin Flo11 is
required for pseudohyphae formation and invasion bySaccha-
romyces cerevisiae.Mol Biol Cell9: 161–171.
Lombardo A et al. 1990. Cloning and characterization of the
iron-sulfur subunit gene succinate dehydrogenase fromSaccha-
romyces cerevisiae.J Biol Chem265: 10419–10423.
Lomni H et al. 1990. Immobilized yeast reactor speeds beer pro-
duction.Food Technol5: 128–133.
Lucero P et al. 1993. Catabolite inactivation of the yeast maltose
transporter is due to proteolysis.FEBS Lett333: 165–168.

MacDonald J et al. 1984. Current approaches to brewery fermenta-
tions.Prog Ind Microbiol19: 47–198.
MacWilliam I.C. 1968. Wort composition. JInstBrew74:
38–54.
Maeba H et al. 2000. Primary fermentation with immobilized yeast
in porous chitosan beads. Pilot scale trial. Proceedings of the 26th
Convention of the Institute Brewing, Australia and New Zealand
Section, Singapore, pp. 82–86.
Magarifuchi T et al. 1995. Effect of yeast fumarase gene (FUM1)
disruption on the production of malic, fumaric and succinic acids
in sake mash.J Ferment Bioeng80: 355–361.
Magee PT, de Robinson-Szulmajster H. 1968. The regulation
of isoleucine-valine biosynthesis inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.
Properties and regulation of the activity of acetohydroxyacid syn-
thase.Eur J Biochem3: 507–511.
Majara N et al. 1996. Trehalose: a stress protectant and stress in-
dicator compound for yeast exposed to adverse conditions.JAm
Soc Brew Chem54: 221–227.
Malcorps P, Dufour J-P. 1987. Proceedings of the European Brew-
ery Convention Congress, Madrid, p. 377.
Malcorps P et al. 1991. A new model for the regulation of ester syn-
thesis by alcohol acetyltransferase inSaccharomyces cerevisiae.
JAmSocBrewChem49: 47–53.
Masschelein CA. 1981. Role of fatty acids in beer flavour. EBC
Flavour Symposium, Copenhagen, Denmark. EBC Monograph
VII, pp. 211–221, 237–238.
Masschelein CA. 1997. A realistic view on the role of research in
the brewing industry today.JInstBrew103: 103–113.
Masschelein CA, Andries M. 1995. Future scenario of immobilized
systems: promises and limitations. EBC Monograph XXIV, EBC
Symposium on immobilized yeast applications in the brewing
industry, Espoo, pp. 223–241.
Masschelein CA et al. 1995. The membrane loop concept: a new ap-
proach for optimal oxygen transfer into high cell density pitching
yeast suspensions. Proceedings of the European Brewery Con-
vention Congress, Brussels, pp. 377–386.
Maule DRJ. 1967. Rapid gas chromatographic examination of beer
flavour.JInstBrew73: 351–361.
McGovern PE et al. 1996. Neolithic resinated wine.Nature381:
480–481.
Meersman E. 1994. Biologische aanzuring met ge ̈ımmobiliseerde
melkzuurbacteri ̈en.Cerevisia Biotechnol19(4): 42–46.
Meilgaard MC. 1975a. Flavour chemistry of beer. Part 1: flavour
interactions between principle volatiles.Tech Quart Master Brew
Assoc Am12: 107–117.
Meilgaard MC. 1975b. Flavour chemistry of beer. Part 2: flavour
and threshold of 239 aroma volatiles.Tech Quart Master Brew
Assoc Am12: 151–173.
Mensour N et al. 1995. Gas lift systems for immobilized cell sys-
tems. EBC Monograph XXIV, EBC Symposium on Immobilized
Yeast Applications in the Brewing Industry, Espoo, pp. 125–
133.
Mensour N et al. 1996. Applications of immobilized yeast cells
in the brewing industry. In: RH Wijffels et al. (eds.)Immo-
bilized Cells: Basics and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam,
pp. 661–671.
Mensour N et al. 1997. New developments in the brewing industry
using immobilized yeast cell bioreactor systems.J Inst Brew103:
363–370.
Free download pdf