BLBS102-c39 BLBS102-Simpson March 21, 2012 14:20 Trim: 276mm X 219mm Printer Name: Yet to Come
754 Part 7: Food Processing
have been applied for pasteurization applications (Patterson and
Loaharanu 2000). Although high irradiation doses have intense
and effective microbial inactivation action, they are not pre-
ferred since they also destroy organoleptic features of the food
material. Thus, low doses of radiation that are severe enough to
reduce microbial populations and maintain sensorial and nutri-
tional quality of foods are generally applied. FDA regulations
specify the maximum radiation dose for control of food-borne
pathogens in fresh or frozen, uncooked poultry products (3 kGy);
refrigerated, uncooked meat products (4.5 kGy); and frozen, un-
cooked meat products (7 kGy) (FDA 2005, Komolprasert 2007).
Low dose (1 kGy maximum) is imposed for control of growth
and maturation inhibition in fresh foods. However, much higher
dose of 30 kGy is imposed for microbial disinfection of dry or
dehydrated spices.
Many studies have demonstrated that low-dose radiation is
useful in improving microbiological safety of fresh-cut fruits
and vegetables without significant change in appearance, tex-
ture, flavor, or nutrition quality (Kim et al. 2006, Niemira and
Fan 2009). Gamma radiation of broccoli, cabbage, tomatoes,
and mung bean sprouts at the dose of 1 kGy resulted in more
than 4 log reduction inListeria monocytogeneswithout signifi-
cant changes in appearance, color, taste, and overall acceptabil-
ity (Bari et al. 2005). Usage of low energy X-ray irradiation
(1 kGy surface dose) on lettuce caused 5 D reduction inE. coli
O157:H7 (Jeong et al. 2010). Reduction in theE. coliO157:H7
count without any effect on quality of spinach leaves was noticed
when gamma irradiation (doses of 0.3–1 kGy) was used (Gomes
et al. 2008). Along with the effect on microorganism, radiation
also denatures enzymes in foods. Latorre et al. (2010) reported
that when red beets were treated with 1–2 kGy gamma radia-
tion, peroxidase (POX) activity increased significantly with the
increasing radiation dose, whereas PPO activity increased only
for a radiation dose of 2 kGy. The trend was attributed to the
higher stiffness and to the rise in tissue elasticity after irradiation.
As a result, color pigments such as betacyanin and betaxanthin
did not change after 1 kGy radiation but decreased sharply at
2 kGy. A detailed review on the use of irradiation in the fruits
and vegetables has been given by Arvanitoyannis et al. (2009).
There are challenges associated with producing and market-
ing irradiated food products. Although it is well established that
food products processed using appropriate low dose of radia-
tion is safe to consume, there continues to be some widespread
hesitation by consumers. There is a strong opposition in the
European Union to irradiated foods, but as food safety takes
center stage internationally and people prioritize food safety,
these attitudes may shift. In the United States, a large number of
irradiated food products are available and without any significant
opposition from consumers. There are strict regulations limiting
the marketing of irradiated products in the United States. The
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act deems a food product to
be adulterated if it has been intentionally irradiated (unless the
irradiation is carried out in compliance with an applicable reg-
ulation under the prescribed conditions of use specified in the
regulation). Irradiated products are required to be adequately
labeled. Further, since most foods are generally prepackaged in
their final form before irradiation, there are serious constrains
on the type of packaging materials that can be used. Komol-
prasert (2007) discussed some of the constraints of irradiation
on packaging materials. To ensure that components of the pack-
aging materials that have been irradiated at a given level do not
migrate into the food, the regulation stipulates that the use of
packaging materials for irradiated food is considered a new use
and is subject to premarket safety evaluation and approval. In
general, development of new methods of irradiation detection
and chemical analysis of trace elements in foods could expedite
introduction of safe and quality irradiated products and enhance
consumer confidence in accepting the products.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound processing is the application of high-intensity sound
waves (20–100 kHz) on foods. The technology can be used
mainly in two ways: as a diagnostic tool for nondestructive
quality evaluation and as energy for processing (Mason et al.
2005). In the past, ultrasound has been used in quality assess-
ment of agricultural produce (preharvest and postharvest) but is
now increasingly being applied in processing. Ultrasound can
be applied for various operations such as cell disintegration, ex-
traction (phenolic compounds, pigments, lipids, proteins), mix-
ing, acceleration of enzyme activity and microbial fermentation,
emulsification, fruit juice processing, and many other uses. Fur-
ther, ultrasound has also been used for enzyme inactivation and
microbial reduction in food. The effectiveness of ultrasound in its
antimicrobial action is based on controlling critical factors such
as frequency and intensity of wave and time of exposure. Actual
application depends on the type of microorganism, temperature,
and the nature of the food. In fluid systems, ultrasound induces
rapid appearance, growth, and collapse of bubbles or cavitations,
leading to considerable agitation, localized “hot spots,” and in-
creased bulk transport within the mass (Mulet et al. 2003). In
solids, ultrasound produces series of rapid compression and ex-
pansions of the material comparable to repeated squeezing and
releasing of a sponge, which enhances mass transfer and creates
microchannels for fluid movement (Floros and Liang 1994).
Thus, when applied to solid–fluid systems, both internal and ex-
ternal resistances to mass transfer between the solid and liquid
phases are affected. The interaction of ultrasound in solid–fluid
interfaces can produce a microagitation in the immediate vicinity
of the solid surface, resulting in reduction of diffusion bound-
ary layer thickness (Mulet et al. 2010). It was reported that the
extractive value of herbs such as for fennel, hops, marigold, and
mint increased by 34%, 18%, 2%, and 3%, respectively, in water,
whereas in ethanol, there was an increase of 34%, 12%, 3%, and
7%, respectively, when ultrasound extraction was applied when
compared to conventional methods (Vinatoru 2001). Different
solvents may present varying effect on extraction effectiveness
of ultrasound. For extraction of carnosic acid from rosemary, ul-
trasound improved the relative performance of ethanol such that
it was comparable to butanone and ethyl acetate alone. Thus,
ultrasonication may reduce the dependence on harsh solvents
and enable use of environmentally benign solvents (Albu et al.
2004). Knorr et al. (2004) and Vilkhu et al. (2008) provided
good review of applications of ultrasound in the food industry.