Chapter 10. Comparative analysis of mango value chain models in Benin, Burkina Faso and Ghana 329
For each of these models we have chosen a representative case study in one or more of the countries.
For each case study we selected respondents for semi-structured interviews using a specialist sampling
technique, called non-probability sampling. The most important factors have been the respondents’
availability to answer the questions. Before starting the surveys, we verified whether respondents would
meet the sample criteria, as presented in Section 2 above. In Table 6 the key characteristics of the value-
chain models are depicted for each selected case study. Table 7 provides an overview of the sample size.
Table 5. Most common chain models in Benin, Burkina Faso and Ghana
Chain model End product/market Benin Burkina Faso GhanaTraditional value chain Fresh mango for local markets
Modern urban /
Processing value chainFresh mango for modern urban markets or
processed mango (dried/juice) for export markets
Export value chain Export value chain (fresh/fresh-cut)Table 6. Overview of five mango chain models
Selected Case Model Country Degree of external
interventionsDegree of
internal resource
exchangeLevel of small-
holder cooperative
actionTraditional
Individual mango farmers
around ParakouTraditional
value chain Benin - - -Intensive contract
farming
Integrated Tamale
Fruit Company (ITFC)
outgrower schemeExport value
chain Ghana ++ ++ +/-Dangwe West
Producers AssociationExport value
chain Ghana + + ++
Cooperative Agricole
de Kenedougou
(COOPAKE)
AssociationModern
urban/
Processing
value chainBurkina
Faso + + ++Semi-intensive contract
farming Smallholders
selling to Dafani SAModern
urban /
Processing
value chainBurkina
Faso + + +