GTBL042-11 GTBL042-Callister-v3 October 4, 2007 11:59
2nd Revised Pages
11.17 Factors That Influence Melting and Glass Transition Temperatures • 451
Molecular weight
Temperature
101 102 103 104 105 106 107
Tm
Tg
Mobile liquid Viscous
liquid
Rubber
Tough plastic
Partially
crystalline
plastic
Crystalline solid
Figure 11.48
Dependence of polymer
properties as well as
melting and glass
transition temperatures
on molecular weight.
(From F. W. Billmeyer,
Jr.,Textbook of Polymer
Science, 3rd edition.
Copyright©c1984 by
John Wiley & Sons, New
York. Reprinted by
permission of John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.)
Glass Transition Temperature
Upon heating through the glass transition temperature, the amorphous solid polymer
transforms from a rigid to a rubbery state. Correspondingly, the molecules that are
virtually frozen in position belowTgbegin to experience rotational and translational
motions aboveTg. Thus, the value of the glass transition temperature will depend
on molecular characteristics that affect chain stiffness; most of these factors and
their influences are the same as for the melting temperature, as discussed above.
Again, chain flexibility is diminished andTgis increased by the presence of the
following:
1.Bulky side groups; from Table 11.3, the respective values for polypropylene
and polystyrene are –18◦C and 100◦C.
2.Polar groups; for example, theTgvalues for poly(vinyl chloride) and
polypropylene are 87◦C and –18◦C, respectively.
3.Double bonds and aromatic groups in the backbone, which tend to stiffen the
polymer chain.
Increasing the molecular weight also tends to raise the glass transition temper-
ature, as noted in Figure 11.48. A small amount of branching will tend to lowerTg;
on the other hand, a high density of branches reduces chain mobility, and elevates
the glass transition temperature. Some amorphous polymers are crosslinked, which
has been observed to elevateTg; crosslinks restrict molecular motion. With a high
density of crosslinks, molecular motion is virtually disallowed; long-range molecular
motion is prevented, to the degree that these polymers do not experience a glass
transition or its accompanying softening.
From the preceding discussion it is evident that essentially the same molecu-
lar characteristics raise and lower both melting and glass transition temperatures.
Normally the value ofTglies somewhere between 0.5 and 0.8Tm(in Kelvin). Conse-
quently, for a homopolymer, it is not possible to independently vary bothTmandTg.
A greater degree of control over these two parameters is possible by the synthesis
and utilization of copolymeric materials.