Example 12.11 A new vaccine will be tested in which subjects are to be
randomized into two groups of equal size: a control (unimmunized) group and
an experimental (immunized) group. Based on prior knowledge about the vac-
cine through small pilot studies, the following assumptions are made:
- The infection of the control group (when challenged by a certain type of
bacteria) is expected to be about 50%:
p 2 ¼ 0 : 50
- About 80% of the experimental group is expected to develop adequate
antibodies (i.e., at least a twofold increase). If antibodies are inadequate,
the infection rate is about the same as for a control subject. But if an
experimental subject has adequate antibodies, the vaccine is expected to
be about 85% e¤ective (which corresponds to a 15% infection rate against
the challenged bacteria).
Putting these assumptions together, we obtain an expected value ofp 1 :
p 1 ¼ð 0 : 80 Þð 0 : 15 Þþð 0 : 20 Þð 0 : 50 Þ
¼ 0 : 22
Suppose also that we decide to preseta¼ 0 :05 and want the power to be about
95% (i.e.,b¼ 0 :05). In other words, we use
z 1 a¼ 1 : 96
z 1 b¼ 1 : 65
From this information, the total sample size required is
N¼ð 4 Þð 1 : 96 þ 1 : 65 Þ^2
ð 0 : 36 Þð 0 : 64 Þ
ð 0 : 50 0 : 22 Þ^2
F 154
so that each group will have 77 subjects. In this solution we use
p¼ 0 : 36
the average of 22% and 50%.
12.9.3 Survival Time as the Endpoint
When patients’ survivorship is considered as the endpoint of a trial, the prob-
lem may look similar to that of comparing two proportions. For example, one
can focus on a conventional time span, say five years, and compare the two
466 STUDY DESIGNS