survival rates. The comparision of the five-year survival rate from an experi-
mental treatment versus the five-year survival rate from a standard regimen,
say in the analysis of results from a trial of cancer treatments, fits the frame-
work of a comparison of two population proportions as seen in Section 12.4.2.
The problem is that for survival data, studies have staggered entry and subjects
are followed for varying lengths of time; they do not have the same probability
for the event to occur. Therefore, similar to the process of data analysis, the
process of sample size determination should be treated di¤erently for trials
where the endpoint is binary from trials when the endpoint is survival time.
As seen in Chapter 11, the log-rank test has become commonly used in the
analysis of clinical trials where event or outcome become manifest only after a
prolonged time interval. The method for sample size determination, where the
di¤erence in survival experience of the two groups in a clinical trial is tested
using the log-rank test, proceeds as followed. Suppose that the two treatments
give rise to survival ratesP 1 (for the experimental treatment) andP 2 (for the
standard regimen), respectively, at some conventional time point: say, five
years. If the ratio of the two hazards (or risk functions) in the two groups are
assumed not changing with time in a proportional hazards model (PHM) and is
y:1, the quantitiesP 1 ,P 2 , andyare related to each other by
y¼
lnP 1
lnP 2
- The total number of eventsdfrom both treatment arms needed to be
observed in the trial is given by
d¼ðz 1 aþz 1 bÞ^2
1 þy
1 y
2
In this formula the quantitiesz 1 aandz 1 b are defined as in Section
12.9.2, andyis the hazards ratio.
- Once the total number of eventsdfrom both treatment arms has been
estimated, the total number of patientsNrequired in the trial can be cal-
culated from
N¼
2 d
2 P 1 P 2
assuming equal numbers of patients randomized into the two treatment
arms, withN=2 in each group. In this formula the quantitiesP 1 andP 2
are five-year (or two- or three-year) survival rates.
Example 12.12 Consider the planning of a clinical trial of superficial bladder
cancer. With the current method of treatment (resection of tumor at cysto-
scopy), the recurrence-free rate [i.e., the survival rate when the event under
investigation is recurrency (the tumor comes back)] is 50% at two years. Inves-
SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION FOR PHASE III TRIALS 467