9781118041581

(Nancy Kaufman) #1
Summary 387

b. Explain why a lower price by its competitor should cause the firm to
lower its own price.
c. In equilibrium, the firms set identical prices: P 1 P 2. Find the firms’
equilibrium prices, quantities, and profits.


  1. Suppose instead that the firms in Problem 9 compete by setting
    quantities rather than prices. All other facts are the same. It is possible
    to rewrite the original demand equations as P 1 [150 (2/3)Q 2 ] 
    (4/3)Q 1 and P 2 [150 (2/3)Q 1 ] (4/3)Q 2. In words, increases in
    the competitor’s output lowers the intercept of the firm’s demand
    curve.
    a. Set MR 1 MC to confirm that firm 1’s optimal quantity depends on
    Q 2 according to Q 1  45  .25Q 2. Explain why an increase in one
    firm’s output tends to deter production by the other.
    b. In equilibrium, the firms set identical quantities: Q 1 Q 2. Find the
    firms’ equilibrium quantities, prices, and profits.
    c. Compare the firms’ profits under quantity competition and price
    competition (Problem 9). Provide an intuitive explanation for why
    price competition is more intense (i.e., leads to lower equilibrium
    profits).

  2. Suppose four firms engage in price competition in a Bertrand setting
    where the lowest-price firm will capture the entire market. The firms
    differ with respect to their costs. Firm A’s marginal cost per unit is $8,
    firm B’s is $7, firm C’s is $9, and firm D’s is $7.50.
    a. Which firm will serve the market? What price (approximately) will it
    charge?
    b. Would your answer change if firms A and B had somewhat greater
    fixed costs of production than firms C and D?

  3. In Problem 9, suppose that firm 2 acts as a price leader and can commit
    in advance to setting its price once and for all. In turn, firm 1 will react
    to firm 2’s price, according to the profit-maximizing response found
    earlier, P 1 52.5  .25P 2. In committing to a price, firm 2 is contemplat-
    ing either a price increase to P 2 $73 or a price cut to P 2 $67. Which
    price constitutes firm 2’s optimal commitment strategy? Justify your
    answer and explain whyit makes sense.

  4. Firm Z faces the price equation P  50 A.5Q, and the cost function
    C 20Q A, where A denotes advertising spending.
    a. Other things (price) held constant, does an increase in advertising
    spending lead to greater sales? Does advertising spending represent a
    fixed cost or a variable cost?
    b. Find the firm’s profit-maximizing quantity as a function of A. (Hint:
    Treating A as fixed, we have MR  50 A.52Q.) Do the same for
    the firm’s price. Explain these results.


c09Oligopoly.qxd 9/29/11 1:32 PM Page 387

Free download pdf