just outbidding the highest possible bid of firm 2. In sum, firm 1’s
equilibrium bidding does very well (is nearly optimal), even if the
competitor pursues nonequilibrium bidding strategies.
- The less well-informed buyer must be wary of the winner’s curse. Any
time that the buyer wins the bidding, it must be because the better-
informed rival has made a lower bid knowing that the item’s value is low.
The disadvantaged buyer only wins low-value items and tends to overpay
for them. It is best to stay out of the auction altogether. - The expected price at the English auction is (.4)(0) (.6)(100) $60.
In the sealed-bid auction, bids are bi[(n 1)/n]vi .75vi. Thus,
E(bmax) .75E(vmax), since the buyer with the highest value makes the
highest bid. From Equation 16.5, E(vmax) [n/(n 1)]100 80.
Therefore, E(bmax) (.75)(80) $60. The auctions deliver the same
expected revenue.
706 Chapter 16 Auctions and Competitive Bidding
c16AuctionsandCompetitiveBidding.qxd 9/26/11 1:09 PM Page 706