INSIGHTS | PERSPECTIVES
GRAPHIC: N. CARY/
SCIENCE
science.org SCIENCE
By Myles Smith
W
ith the emergence of drug-resis-
tant bacteria that can evade cur-
rent frontline therapeutics, the
need for antibiotics with new
modes of action is increasingly
urgent ( 1 ). One emerging strategy
to address this need is to revisit previously
identified antibiotics of promise and ap-
ply modern medicinal chemistry and bio-
chemical tools to improve their
activity and unveil their often
ill-defined modes of action (2,
3 ). Among such natural products
is himastatin ( 1 ), a dimeric pep-
tide antibiotic isolated in 1990
that shows good activity against
Gram-positive bacteria, albeit
through a largely unknown mode
of action ( 4 ). On page 894 of this
issue, D’Angelo et al. ( 5 ) develop
an efficient chemical synthesis
of himastatin through a bioin-
spired dimerization of its native
monomeric units. This approach
provides a blueprint to access not
only this complex target and its
derivatives, but also molecular
probes that allow for its mode of
action to be elucidated ( 5 ).
The most intuitive simplifica-
tion in the retrosynthesis of a
challenging dimeric target such
as 1 would be to break its struc-
ture into two units of its mono-
mer, depsipeptide 2 , by cleaving
the central C5–C5 9 bond. This ap-
proach reduces the synthetic task
to the preparation of monomer
2 , provided a method could be
found to unite the halves at the
correct position. Such a dimer-
ization is used by the producing
organism in the biosynthesis of 1 through
P450-catalyzed oxidative dimerization of 2.
Being able to effect such a transformation
by chemical means is a daunting challenge.
Any developed method would need to toler-
ate the numerous functional groups in the
complex peptide backbone of 2 , which might
interfere through their reactive nitrogen and
oxygen atoms, as well as forge the necessary
carbon–carbon bond selectively at one spe-
cific position on each monomer. Prior ap-
proaches to natural products related to 1 had
unsuccessfully attempted similar late-stage
dimerizations, and lengthy two-directional
strategies were used in which a simplified
dimeric core is grown outward into each
macrocyclic half. This approach was initially
showcased in Kamenecka and Danishefsky’s
inaugural synthesis of 1 ( 6 ) and in later ef-
forts for the synthesis of chloptosin ( 7 , 8 ).
From a biological standpoint, the dimeric
structure of 1 is vital for its antibacterial
properties, with monomeric compounds like
2 showing no activity ( 6 ).
Inspired by the simplicity of the biosyn-
thetic route, D’Angelo et al. began by de-
veloping a dimerization process on simpler
cyclotryptophan and cyclotryptamine com-
pounds using either a silver(I)- or copper(II)-
based oxidant to selectively arrive at C5–C5 9
dimers in useful yields without the need for
C5 prefunctionalization. Mechanistic studies
showed that such couplings likely proceed
through dimerization of an aniline radical
cation, forming the new C–C bond at the
most accessible C5 position. To prepare the
necessary monomer 2 , they combined the
convenience of solid-phase synthesis of a
pentadepsipeptide with solution-phase cou-
pling of the more tricky cyclotryptophan
unit and a final macrolactamization to form
the 18-membered ring in a highly efficient
manner (see the figure). With monomer 2 in
hand, the authors performed the dimeriza-
tion with a stoichiometric copper(II) oxidant
to deliver 1 in 40% yield.
Given the complexity of the substrate,
the obtained yield is surprisingly high, and
the efficiency of the dimerization is notable
given the absence of any protecting groups
in 2 that would typically be used to mask
reactive groups that might otherwise risk
being oxidized themselves or sequester the
metal oxidant. The convergent synthesis of 2
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Dimerization decrypts antibiotic activity
Direct dimerization simplifies the synthesis of himastatin and elucidates its mode of action
Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Email: [email protected]
N
H
N
HN O
N
NH
N
H
O
O
O
OOO
Me Me
Me
Me
H
N
OH
OH Me
Me
HO
H
H
N
N
NH
O
N
HN
H
N
OOO
O
O
O
Me Me
Me
Me
N
H
HO
Me
Me
OH
Me
OH
H
5
5
5'
Me
N
H
N
HN O
N
N NH
H
OOO
OOO
Me Me
Me
Me
H
N
OH
Me
Me
OH
Me
HO
H
N
H
N
HO
H
H
N
N
OH
H
N
H
NH
TESO
H
CO 2 Allyl
HO 2 C
HO 2 C
FmocHN
NHFmoc
O
N
NHFmoc
O
O
Me Me
Me
Teoc
N
OTBS
Me
Ot-Bu Me
Me
Me
O O
+
+
Abbreviations: Me, methyl; t-Bu, tert-butyl; Teoc, 2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxycarbonyl; Fmoc, 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl; TBS, tert-butyl(dimethyl)silyl;
TES, triethylsilyl; and DTBMP, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine.
Himastatin: 1
Himastatin monomer: 2
Coupling reactions
(25% overall)
(40%)
Radical-radical coupling
Dye-tag
site
Direct dimerization
of unprotected monomers
Cu(SbF 6 ) 2 DTBMP
(oxidation)
Hybrid solid- and
solution-phase synthesis
Solid
support
Cyclization
Streamlining dimerization
Chemical routes to forming large peptide dimers like himastatin ( 1 ) from its monomer ( 2 ) usually are unsuccessful.
D’Angelo et al. report a bioinspired oxidative coupling route that performs this step in useful yields.
820 25 FEBRUARY 2022 • VOL 375 ISSUE 6583