Effect of discontinuities on the proximate state of stress 67
t
Discontinuity
filling
E, - Young’s modulus
of discontinuity
filling
E - Young’s modulus
Major of surrounding
principal (TI rock
stress
Case 1 : E, = 0
Case 2 : E, = E
Case 3 : E, +-m Discontinuity filling is
Open discontinuity
Discontinuity filling has same
modulus as surrounding rock
effectively rigid
Figure 4.20 Effect of stiffness of discontinuity filling material on the stress state. Two
extreme cases are shown-where the discontinuity filling has a modulus of zero
(Case 1) and infinity (Case 3)-together with an intermediate case where the
discontinuity filling has the same modulus as the surrounding rock (Case 2).
> Tectonic
Regional Continental
Local Near field Far field
stresses being unaffected. At the other end of the spectrum, in Case 3, the
discontinuity is filled by a rigid material. Then, the major principal stress
is drawn in perpendicular to the discontinuity and the minor principal
stress becomes parallel to the discontinuity.
In general, for most engineering circumstances such as discontinuities
or back-filled mine stopes, the stress distribution will be between those
shown for Cases 1 and 2. A circumstance between Cases 2 and 3 could arise
where a discontinuity in a soft rock is filled with a stiffer material, e.g.
quartz veins in soft limestone or a volcanic pipe surrounded by softer rocks.
We have mentioned that the discontinuities being considered could be
on a variety of scales. In fact, we would expect effects such as those
illustrated in Fig. 4.20 to be superimposed as a result of the existence of
IT
Grain Layer Jointed Pluton Heterogeneity
scale scale block scale scale scale
Fractal
equilibrium
volumes
Overcore
applied
Small Domain size
Figure 4.21 Stress state-scale relations.
Large