The Sociology of Philosophies

(Wang) #1

  1. By the 1770s and 1780s, these included Hutton, whose geology overturned biblical
    chronology, and Lord Monboddo, who produced early speculations on the evolu-
    tion of humans from the apes. Sources on the social history of Scotland (CMH,
    1902–1911: 6:117; Daiches, Jones, and Jones, 1986; Sher, 1985; Camic, 1983).

  2. Hume was only in his mid-twenties when he wrote his Treatise in the 1730s. Once
    again, age is important only as it coincides with structural opportunity.


12. The German University Revolution



  1. These are Bergson, Dewey, Moore, Russell, Wittgenstein, Carnap, Husserl, and
    Heidegger; at least another 12 are in the running for secondary: Croce, Schlick,
    Meinong, Scheler, Cassirer, Rickert, McTaggart, Whitehead, Alexander, Santayana,
    G. H. Mead, and C. I. Lewis. For sources, see Chapter 10, notes 1 and 3. Com-
    paring Figures 10.1 and 11.1, we see that the number of major philosophers in
    any one generation in Europe is never more than 3—a pattern in keeping with that
    for medieval Christendom, Islam, India, China, and Greece. By my standard
    method of ranking by amount of attention given in comprehensive histories, for
    1865–1900 the number of major philosophers is 5 (Peirce, James, Frege, Bradley,
    and Nietzsche). For secondary philosophers, the number calculated rises for 1835–
    1865 to 12, for 1865–1900 to 9, and 1900–1935 to 12. These numbers are as
    high as or higher than those for even the most active generations in all of past
    history—the generation of 335–300 b.c.e. in Greece, when there were 8 secondar-
    ies, and 1265–1300 in medieval Christendom, when there were 9. It appears that
    we are gradually losing perspective on the fifth generation back from our own,
    that of 1835–1865, and almost certainly on the 1865–1900 generation. Within the
    next few generations of our future, some of these major figures will fall to secon-
    dary historical influence, and some secondaries to minor.
    Unlike earlier network figures in the book, those in Chapters 12–14 list everyone
    by name and thus do not distinguish rankings by capitalization and key numbers.
    For convenience, what follows is a list of European philosophers ranked major (all
    capitals) and secondary by generation: 1600: bacon, Suarez, Campanella, Herbert
    of Cherbury, Boehme, Grotius; 1635: descartes, hobbes, More, Cudworth, Ar-
    nauld, Mersenne, Gassendi, Pascal; 1665: spinoza, leibniz, locke, Malebranche,
    Bayle, Thomasius; 1700: berkeley, Shaftesbury, Hutcheson, Wolff, Vico; 1735:
    hume, rousseau, Voltaire, Montesquieu, d’Holbach, Diderot, d’Alembert, Con-
    dillac, Butler, Adam Smith, Reid; 1765: kant, fichte, Hamann, Lessing, Herder,
    Jacobi, Schiller, Paley, Bentham, Condorcet; 1800: schelling, hegel, schopen-
    hauer, Schleiermacher, Herbart, Maine de Biran, Cousin, Saint-Simon; 1835: j. s.
    mill, Spencer, Huxley, Newman, Kierkegaard, Emerson, Comte, Renouvier, Marx,
    Engels, Lotze, Fechner, Boole; 1865: peirce, james, bradley, nietzsche, frege,
    Green, Bosanquet, Royce, Wundt, Mach, Brentano, Dilthey, von Hartmann, Her-
    mann Cohen.

  2. In anglophone philosophy, the canonical reputations of Berkeley and Hume were
    not established until the 1870s; until then Reid and Dugald Stewart were better
    known (Kaufmann, 1966: 277–278; Kuklick, 1984).


Notes to Pages 615–621^ •^1003
Free download pdf