100 QUESTIONS IN CARDIOLOGY

(Michael S) #1

14 What is the sensitivity, specificity and positive


predictive value of an abnormal exercise test?


Vic Froelicher


While sensitivity (% of those with disease who have an abnormal

test) and specificity (% of those without disease who have a

normal test) are relatively independent of disease prevalence they

are reciprocally related and dependent upon the cut point or

criterion chosen for diagnosis. The positive predictive value of an

abnormal test (% of those with an abnormal test that have

disease) is directly related to the prevalence of disease. Another

way to compare the diagnostic characteristics of a test is by use of

predictive accuracy that is the percentage of total true calls (both

negative and positive). While it is affected by disease prevalence,

since diagnostic testing is usually only indicated when the pre-

test probability is 50% (i.e. a disease prevalence of 50%) this

measurement is a simple way of comparing test performance.

Meta-analysis of the exercise test studies with angiographic

correlates has demonstrated the standard ST response (1mm

depression) to have an average sensitivity of 68% and a

specificity of 72% and a predictive accuracy of 69%.^1 But most

of these studies have been affected by work up bias that means

that those with abnormal tests were more likely to be entered

into the studies to be catheterised. When work up bias is

removed by having all patients with chest pain undergo

catheterisation different results are obtained though the

predictive accuracy remains the same. In such a study we found

a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 85%.^2 It appears that

this is how the test performs in the clinic or doctor’s office.

However, the inclusion of clinical and other test results in

scores can increase the predictive accuracy of the standard

exercise test to nearly 90%.^3

RReeffeerreenncceess
1 Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D et al. Exercise-induced ST
depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
Circulation1989; 8800 : 87–98.
2 Froelicher VF, Lehmann KG, Thomas R et al.The ECG exercise test in a
population with reduced workup bias: diagnostic performance,
computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction. Veterans

Free download pdf