728Table 31.4.
Comparison of Pathogen Subtyping and Verification Methods
Amount ofMethodAdvantagesDisadvantagesDNA requiredRFLP- Simplicity
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
3–5g- Can be done with restriction
- Many bands to compare; confusing,
endonucleases for serotypemay be hard to see differenceslevel discrimination or combined- Cannot compare organisms at the genus or
with PCR for lineage comparisonsfamily level- Partial digestion and faint bands may be a
problemAFLP- PCR to amplify a few genes and simplify
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
10–100 ngresult analysis- Cannot compare organisms at the genus or
- Can compare differences between bands on a gel
family level- Fewer bands to compare than with RFLP• Can compare among labs
RAPD- Universal primers that are not gene specific
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
10 ng- Is not very reproducible between gels or labs• Cannot compare organisms at the genus or
family levelRibotyping- Similar to RFLP, but visualizes only bands
- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
1gcorrelating to therrnportion of ribosomesso fewer bands to compare- Can compare organisms at the genus and
family levelPulsed-field- PulseNet database available to
- Time consuming—3 days for results
Measured bygelcoordinate and compare- Requires pure cultures of pathogen
turbidity ofElectrophoresisresults—can track outbreaks- Patterns may change after intestinal
culture–lysis- Can compare differences between
passage; differences in patterns mayand DNAbands on a gelnot indicate actual straindigestion- Results are comparable among labs
differencesperformed in- Cannot compare organisms at the
agarose plugsgenus or family levelFISH- May detect one pathogen in a mixed
- Cells must be fixed and
Single cellcommunity of microbespermeabilized before visualizationlevelSource:Adapted from Gurtler and Mayall 2001, Savelkuoh et al. 1999.