This book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licensemetacognition—in order to insure that the content was complete, accurate, and important to learn.
It also grouped students into teams, so that they could, to some extent, teach each other whatever
they needed to learn, including helping each other to sense whether they actually were learning
from their research.Questions
➢ Obviously these two studies are about different educational problems or issues. What if the
learning theories underlying them were switched? Could a stuttering program be built
around constructivist principles of learning, and a health education program be built
around behaviorist principles? What would each program look like?
➢ Be a skeptic for a moment. What do you suspect might be the hardest part of
implementing behavioral conditioning for stuttering described by Onslow? And what
might be hardest part of implementing the constructivist program about health education?References
Onslow, M., Menzies, R., & Packman, A. (2001). An operant intervention for early stuttering. Behavior
modification 25(1), 116-139.
Goldman, J. (2006). Web-based designed activities for young people in health education: A constructivist
approach. Health Education Journal 65(1), 14-27.Educational Psychology 323 A Global Text