Mar.4] SOCIETYOF BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY. [1890.
A FORGOTTEN PRINCE.
By A. Wiedemann.
The relations between Ramses II and his father have often
beentreatedin different ways(p. ex., Maspero, Hist,ana, 217 sq. ;
Brugsch,Gesch.Aeg., 469 sq. ; Wiedemann, Handbuch,418,427),
but in the discussion it was generally overlooked that Ramses
was not the eldest son of Seti I. The eldestson appears three
times in the description of Seti I's war in the north. Firstlyis
foundthe picture of a prince bringingprisoners to the king; his
title (feZja 1 ft r> fl is given, butnot his name (Champ.,Mon.,
290,2; Not., Sj sq. ; Rosell., Mon.st., 46, 1 ; Guieysse, Rec.de
trav., XI, 56). The second representation (Champ., Mon., 292 ;
Not., 91 sqq. ; Ros., Mon.st., 50 sq. ; L. D. Ill, 128a; Guieysse,
- c, 59 ; cf. Leps., Koenigsb.,nr. 416) showsthe return of Seti I
from the war in the first year of his reign. Behind the king a
princestandswiththe bow and flabellum, andabovethe inscription
tM''-?A&V^Z^M]. Rosellini gives,in the destroyed parts,some
signs whichappear to be very doubtful; so is also the / 1 at
the end, givenas certain by Lepsius andChamp*,Mon.,as uncertain
by Champ., Not.,and wanting in Rosellini. Thewordsshowthat the
princeaccompaniedhis father to the country of Retennu. His titles
are the usual onesof Egyptian princes;onlyTO \J I ryj gA 1\
is new. Theword ' [~0 SO was l°°kedupon by Guieysse as an
abbreviatedform of 0^^'^,'^! & > "maiidire," andthe
title translated "le grand des imprecations;" to me it appears
more probable thatit is a causative of [TJ Qrt, " praise,"andthat
the title wasa priestly one,meaning" the high-praiser at " (follows
258