Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes

(ff) #1

(elastic demand), but they are also the ones with the greatest potential for
increased deforestation.
So is agroforestry likely to reduce deforestation? After criticizing those who
gave an unconditional “Yes” to this question, we will avoid going to the other
extreme by saying “No.” Rather, we argue that it depends on the particular
case, and our aim has been to point to a number of factors that determine net
effects on deforestation.


References

Angelsen, A. 1995. Shifting cultivation and “deforestation”: a study from Indonesia. Wo rl d
Development23:1713–1729.
Angelsen, A. 1999. Agricultural expansion and deforestation: modelling the impact of pop-
ulation, market forces and property rights. Journal of Development Economics
58:185–218.
Angelsen, A., and D. Kaimowitz (eds.). 2001. Agricultural technologies and tropical deforesta-
tion.Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Angelsen, A., and M. Luckert. In press. Limited or unlimited wants in the presence of lim-
ited means? Inquiries into the role of satiation in affecting deforestation. In D. J. Zarin,
J. Alavalapati, F. E. Putz, and M. C. Schmink (eds.), Wo rking forests in the American trop-
ics: conservation through sustainable management?New York: Colombia University Press.
ASB. 1994. Alternatives to slash-and-burn. A global strategy.Nairobi: International Center
for Research in Agroforestry.
Boserup, E. 1965. The conditions for agricultural growth. The economics of agrarian change
under population pressure.London: Allen and Unwin; Chicago: Aldine.
Brady, D. E., D. P. Garrity, and P. A. Sanchez. 1993. The worldwide problem of slash-and-
burn agriculture. Agroforestry Today5:2–6.
Cattaneo, A. 2001. A general equilibrium analysis of technology, migration and deforesta-
tion in the Brazilian Amazon. Pages 69–90 in A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz (eds.),
Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation.Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Coxhead, I., G. Shively, and X. Shuai. 2001. Agricultural development policies and land
expansion in a southern Philippine watershed. Pages 347–366 in A. Angelsen and
D. Kaimowitz (eds.), Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation.Wallingford, UK:
CAB International.
de Jong, W. 2001. The impact of rubber on the forest landscape in Borneo. Pages 367–383
in A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz (eds.), Agricultural technologies and tropical deforesta-
tion.Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Dixon, R. K. 1995. Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases. Agroforestry
Systems31:99–116.
Dixon, R. K., J. K. Winjum, and P. E. Schroeder. 1993. Conservation and sequestration of
carbon: the potential of forest and agroforest management practices. Global Environmen-
tal Change3:159–173.
Ensminger, J. 1996. Culture and property rights. Pages 179–203 in S. Hanna, C. Folke,
and K.-G. Mäler (eds.), Rights to nature: ecological, economic, cultural, and political prin-
ciples of institutions for the environment.Washington, DC: Island Press.
Franzel, S. 1999. Socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption potential of improved tree
fallows in Africa. Agroforestry Systems47:305–321.


104 II. The Ecological Economics of Agroforestry

Free download pdf