Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes

(ff) #1

Box 8.2. Main Features of Community-Level Biodiversity
in Shifting Cultivation Landscapes



  • Cultivated plants belong mainly to a few species, but crop fields may
    harbor important agrobiodiversity at the genetic level whose creation
    and maintenance are little understood.
    •Weed communities sometimes are quite diverse and potentially valu-
    able for medicines and food and perhaps for some aspects of ecosys-
    tem function but have low intrinsic conservation value.
    •Weeds such as Chromolaena odoratamay become dominant and
    inhibit successional change for many years.

  • Forest tree species are among the trees conserved by farmers but usu-
    ally belong to the small subset of species that have some kind of value
    to farmers.

  • The fallow plant community is dominated by species with high resprout-
    ing capacity and pioneers with precocious fruiting and functioning
    seed dispersal mechanisms.

  • Although fallow plant communities change over time, their species rich-
    ness and diversity, as well as their representation of forest-dependent
    species, remain low in comparison with original forest.
    •A trend toward shorter fallows further limits potential for biodiversity
    recovery in patches.

  • Fallow and secondary forest communities are not a stage in the recovery
    of original forest but are entirely new, anthropogenic vegetation types.

  • The number of vertebrate species that make exclusive use of single
    habitat patches probably is limited because of the small size of such
    patches, so their community characteristics must be characterized and
    understood at the landscape scale (see Box 8.1).
    •Crop fields, fallows, and secondary forest patches nevertheless are used
    by many forest vertebrates (with some more frequently observed in such
    patches than in mature forest) and species of disturbed habitats.

  • The diversity of observed vertebrate assemblages or particular compo-
    nents of them may be the same as, lower than, or higher than in mature
    forest, depending on factors such as surrounding vegetation.

  • The composition of vertebrate assemblages is more sharply differenti-
    ated between patch types than richness and diversity; declines in some
    bird guilds and increases in others are predictable, for example, when
    comparing mature forest with fallow and secondary vegetation.

  • The diversity and composition of observed vertebrate assemblages
    often change over time.

  • Compositional changes are linked to variation in factors such as habi-
    tat structure, food availability and foraging behavior, microclimate,
    and hunting pressure.

  • Overall, the prevailing short fallows greatly limit the potential for bio-
    diversity recovery, and especially mature forest attributes, in most
    patches in the landscape.

Free download pdf